JUDGMENT :

1. Heard the Party-in-Person Ms. Prapti Apurva Dave and learned Advocate Mr. Jayant P. Bhatt on behalf of the respondent.

2. Issue Rule returnable forthwith. Learned Advocate Mr. Bhatt waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent.

3. By way of this application, the Party-in-Person seeks to challenge an order passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Gandhinagar dated 03.09.2022 below Exhibit 177 in Family Suit No. 166 of 2013 whereby the learned Family Court had rejected the application preferred by the Party-in-Person-wife before the Family Court to appoint a medical expert for psychological evaluation of the respondent-original applicant before the Family Court.

4. It is the submission of the Party-in-Person that during the course of examination of two witnesses i.e. one Dr. B. C. Patel and Dr. A. A. Kureshi, who had treated the applicant before the learned Family Court- respondent herein, on two separate occasions, i.e. Dr. B. C. Patel having examined the respondent-husband in connection with a criminal case lodged against husband under the provisions of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and more particularly, in case of Dr. A. A. Kureshi who had treated the re