SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Guj) 1262

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
GITA GOPI, J.
Nilesh Mansukhlal Tolia - Applicant
Versus
State of Gujarat - Respondent
R/Criminal Misc. Application Nos. 4901, 4902, 4904, 4928 of 2021
Decided On : 15-09-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr. Anurag R. Rathor, Mr. Ashish M. Dagli.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mitesh Amin, Public Prosecutor With Mr. Pranav Trivedi, APP.

The right to default bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC is an indefeasible right and not a statutory right. It is a part of the procedure established by law under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Headnote:

GUJCTOC - Extension of investigation period - Report of Public Prosecutor - Notice to accused - Default bail - Indefeasible right - Sanjay Dutt v. State, Through C.B.I., Bombay (II) (1994) 5 SCC 410 - Hitendra Vishnu Thakur v. State of Maharashtra, (1994) 4 SCC 602 - Devinderpal Singh v. Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi, (1996) 1 SCC 44 - Rambeer Shokeen v. State (NCT of Delhi), (2018) 4 SCC 405 - Ateef Nasir Mulla v. State of Maharashtra, 2005 (7) SCC 29 - Bikramjit Singh v. State of Punjab, (2020) 10 SCC 616 - M. Ravindran v. Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, 2021 (2) SCC 485.

Fact of the Case:

Four applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) challenging orders dated 08.01.2021 and 21.01.2021 passed by the Court of learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Special Court (GUJCTOC) at Rajkot in the case of Jamnagar City “A” Division Police Station FIR No.11202008202186 whereby, the applications filed under Section 20(2)(b) of The Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organized Crime Act, 2015 (GUJCTOC) by the Public Prosecutor were allowed and an additional period of 90 days was granted for concluding the investigation.

Finding of the Court:

1. The report of the Public Prosecutor is a valid report and the orders passed by the Special Court are not non-speaking orders. 2. The accused had the knowledge of the report of the Public Prosecutor and the orders passed by the Special Court extending the period of investigation. 3. The accused failed to exercise their right to default bail on the expiry of 90 days. 4. The accused are not entitled to the consequential relief of not filing of charge sheet in time.

Issues: 1. Whether the report of the Public Prosecutor is a valid report? 2. Whether the orders passed by the Special Court are non-speaking orders? 3. Whether the accused had the knowledge of the report of the Public Prosecutor and the orders passed by the Special Court extending the period of investigation? 4. Whether the accused failed to exercise their right to default bail on the expiry of 90 days? 5. Whether the accused are entitled to the consequential relief of not filing of charge sheet in time?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The report of the Public Prosecutor is a valid report as it complies with the requirements of Section 20(2)(b) of the GUJCTOC. 2. The orders passed by the Special Court are not non-speaking orders as they contain the reasons for extending the period of investigation. 3. The accused had the knowledge of the report of the Public Prosecutor and the orders passed by the Special Court extending the period of investigation as they were represented by advocates who had prayed for the certified copies of the orders. 4. The accused failed to exercise their right to default bail on the expiry of 90 days as they did not file applications for default bail until after the Special Court had extended the period of investigation. 5. The accused are not entitled to the consequential relief of not filing of charge sheet in time as they failed to exercise their right to default bail on the expiry of 90 days.

Final Decision: All the petitions are dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

1. These four applications arise out of one and the same First Information Report and involve identical questions on law and facts. Hence, they are decided by this common judgment.

2. Challenge in these four applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as “the Code”) is to the orders dated 08.01.2021 and 21.01.2021 passed below application filed under Section 20(2)(b) of The Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organized Crime Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “the GUJCTOC”) by the Court of learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Special Court (GUJCTOC) at Rajkot in the case of Jamnagar City “A” Division Police Station FIR No.11202008202186 whereby, the said application was allowed and an additional period of 90 days was granted for concluding the investigation.

2.1 Prior to these captioned applications, Criminal Appeal Nos.212/2021, 214/2021, 215/2021 and 315/2021 were preferred to challenge the impugned orders. It was jointly stated by learned Public Prosecutor Mr. Mitesh Amin appearing with learned APP Mr. Pranav Trivedi that the impugned orders were not appealable as per Section 13 of the GUJCTOC and thus, permission was granted vide common order on 09.03.2021 to convert the same under Section 482 of the Code.

3. The facts, in a nutshell, giving rise to the filing of the present applications are as under:-

The Office of the Superintendent of Police, Jamnagar received a secret information that one Jaysukh Muljibhai Ranpariya @ Jayesh Patel (accused No.1) is involved in running and operating an organized crime syndicate in Jamnagar involving extortion, land grabbing, contract killing, money laundering, etc. with the use or threat of violence and criminal intimidation. Such secret information was recorded vide Entry No.03 of 2020 dated 30.09.2020 in the Register maintained for such purpose. The information revealed that the crime syndicate operated by Jaysukh Muljibhai Ranpariya targeted businessmen especially land owners and realtors / developers by intimidating / threatening them with physical injury and / or threat to life with the object of deriving monetary gains. The information further revealed that the accused used voice calls and mobile applications like Whatsapp as well as other VOIP applications to make calls to target their victims. The secret information also revealed the names of some alleged members of the syndicate. On the basis of the secret information so received, the Police Inspector, City ‘A’ Division Police Station, Jamnagar registered the impugned complaint being FIR No.11202008202186 for offences punishable under Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 3(4), 3(5) & 4 of GUJCTOC and Sections 120B, 386, 387, 506(1) and 506(2) of Indian Penal Code on 15.10.2021 against fourteen accused. Six amongst them came to be arrested while the remaining are absconding. By order dated 29.10.2020 passed by the Special Court constituted under the GUJCTOC, the six arrested accused were sent to different Jails at Vadodara, Sabarmati-Ahmedabad and Lajpore-Surat.

4. On arrest of the applicants-accused persons, the Special Court granted their remand and on conclusion of the remand period, they were sent to judicial custody. The applicants had preferred bail applications under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. before the Special Court; however, the same were rejected. Before the expiry of ninety days from the date of arrest, the Public Prosecutor before the Special Court preferred applications under Section 20(2)(b) of the GUJCTOC in each case seeking extension of the period of investigation by ninety days. The particulars in each case, which are relevant for our purpose, are shown hereunder in a tabular form:-

S. No.

Particulars

Date of Arrest

Date of filing application under Section 20(2)(b) of GUJCTOC

1.

Criminal Misc. Application No.4901 of 2021

16.10.2020

08.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top