SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Guj) 626

SONIA GOKANI, SANDEEP N. BHATT
RAJAI MOTORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: AKSHAY A. VAKIL.
For the Respondent: POOJA ASHAR.

ORDER :

1. The petitioner herein is challenging the order dated 17.01.2022 passed by the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal whereby it ordered the pre-deposit of tax of Rs. 3 crores on the basis of Second Appeal No. 593 of 2021.

2. The petitioner is a registered dealer under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (‘the VAT Act’ hereinafter) and Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (‘the CST Act’ hereinafter). The petitioner is engaged in the business of reselling motor cycles, scooter and their parts as well as having the service station of the two wheelers. The present petition concerns the Assessment year 2016-17. The purchases and the sales made by the petitioner were admitted in returns filed under the VAT Act and the CST Act.

2.1 The Assessment Order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Godhara, Unit-46, Panchmahal on 31.03.2021 for the Financial Year 2016-17.

2.2 The Assessing Authority issued notice for Assessment under section 34(2) of the VAT Act and the CST Act. The petitioner remained present. The Assessing Officer was in a hurry to complete the assessment and the orde

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top