IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BHARGAV D. KARIA, D.N.RAY, JJ.
Kandla Motors Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 160 of 2023 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 161 of 2023 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 162 of 2023 With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 163 of 2023
Decided on : 11-10-2024
JUDGMENT :
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA)
1. This Court by order dated 21.06.2023 has admitted Tax Appeals on the following substantial questions of law:
(b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal is justified in not granting waiver of pre-deposit to the appellant even though the entire demand is based upon Section 61 of the VAT Act which is wholly irrelevant to the issue of determination of “sale price”?
(c) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal is justified in not granting waiver of pre-deposit to the appellant even though adjustment of tax liability is clearly permissible under Section 8 of the VAT Act?
(d) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal is justified in not granting waiver of pre-deposit to the appellant even though the appellant has a strong prima facie case squarely supported by decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Southern Motors (supra)?”
2. The appellant preferred Second Appeal before the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal, Ahmedabad [for short ‘the Tribunal’] challenging the order of the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Appeal- 11, Rajkot, for assessment periods pertaining to 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 whereby, the first appeals were summarily dismissed as the appellant did not pay the pre-deposit.
3. The Tribunal passed common order dated 16.06.2022 in Second Appeal Nos. 373 to 379 of 2020 so far as assessment period 2010-2011, 2011-12 and 2012-13 is concerned. The Tribunal held that in view of the ratio laid down by this Court in case of Kavya Marketing vs. State of Gujarat in Special Civil Application No. 1027 of 2022, the Tribunal was of the opinion that no pre-deposit direction is required for the said period as the assessments were made under section 34(8A) of the Value Added Tax Act, 2003. However, for the remaining years, the Tribunal passed the order for pre-deposit of the amount specified in the common order.
4. As the appellant did not deposit the entire pre-deposit amount for the assessment period from 2013-14 to 2016-17, the Tribunal, by common order dated 18.11.2022, dismissed the appeals for the entire period from 2011-12 to 2016-17 oblivious of the fact that the Tribunal did not pass an order for pre-deposit for the assessment period 2010-11 to 2012-13.
5. Learned advocate Mr. Sheth submitted that admittedly, the Tribunal passed the order at the time of admission for the period from 2010-11 to 2012-13 giving no pre-deposit direction and therefore, Second Appeal No. 373 to 379/2020 for the said period could not have been dismissed for non-compliance of the direction of pre-deposit passed by the Tribunal.
6. On perusal of the order dated 16.06.2022 passed by the Tribunal it is apparent that the Tribunal in para 5 of the said order has categorically observed as under:
Southern Motors vs. State of Karnataka and ors reported in (2017) 3 SCC 467
The Tribunal must consider the prima facie case of the appellant before imposing pre-deposit requirements, as mandated by the VAT Act.
The court established that tax authorities must consider evidence and adhere to natural justice principles when determining pre-deposit amounts and input tax credits.
Point of Law – The petitioner is a private limited company engaged in the business of trading in petrochemicals, which is registered under the VAT Act, 2003 as well as Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Th....
The court's decision emphasized the consideration of financial hardship in permitting payment of the pre-deposit in instalments and directing the appellate authority to entertain the appeals without ....
Payments made under protest can count as valid pre-deposits under Section 107 of the GST Act, ensuring equitable relief and proper adjudication in tax disputes.
The requirement of pre-deposit under Section 129E of the Customs Act is mandatory, with limited discretion for waiver in exceptional circumstances, reaffirmed by recent judicial precedents.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.