UMESH A. TRIVEDI, M. K. THAKKER
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Parmar Gopalsinh @ Gokusinh Ramsinh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M. K. THAKKER, J.
1. The appellant- State of Gujarat has preferred this appeal under Section 378 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 27.12.2001 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mehsana in Sessions Case No.95 of 2001 thereby, the respondent-accused was acquitted from the charges punishable under Sections 302, 323, 504 of Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act.
2. It is the case of the prosecution that on 6.3.2001, complainant, namely, Jagatsinh Rajusinh Parmar, was on his Pan Shop and in the night hours, around 9 O’Clock, one Gokusinh Ramsinh Parmar residing in the same village came with Dhariya and asked for the Masala on credit. The complainant denied for the same and therefore, a slap was given by said Gokusinh Ramsinh to the complainant and abused by using filthy language. The complainant immediately went to the house, which is in the field and informed to the father with regard to the behaviour of Gokusinh. The father went for scolding Gokusinh. The complainant and the mother had followed the father and when they reached to the field of Bharatsinh Malusinh and they met to Gokusinh and
Badam Singh V/s. State of Madhya Pradesh
Devatha Venkata Swamy Rangaih v/s. Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Harijana Thirupala and others V/s. Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.
Mahavirsinh V/s. State of Madhya Pradesh
Mahendrasinh and Others v/s. State of M.P.
Mohan @ Srinivas @ Seena @ Tailor Seena V/s. State of Karnataka
Prem Singh V/s. State of Haryana
Ramesh Babulal Doshi vs The State Of Gujarat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.