A. S. SUPEHIA, M. R. MENGDEY
Balkrushna Alias Jamrukh Vinodbhai Parde – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.S. SUPEHIA, J.
1. Heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties.
2. The present petition is directed against the order of detention dated 10.05.2023 passed by the respondent – detaining authority in exercise of powers conferred under section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (for short “the Act”) by detaining the petitioner– detenu as defined under section 2(c) of the Act.
3. Learned advocate for the detenu submitted that the impugned order of detention of the detenu requires to be quashed and set aside because the detaining authority has passed order of detention solely on the ground of registration of two FIRs, for the offences punishable under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1960 by itself cannot bring the case of the detenu within the purview of definition under section 2(c) of the Act. Learned advocate for the petitioner further submitted that illegal activity likely to be carried out or alleged to have been carried out, as alleged, cannot have any nexus or bearing with the maintenance of public order and at the most, it can be said to be breach of law and order. Further, except statement of witnesses, regis
Asha Devi V. Additional Chief Secretary To The Government Of Gujarat And Anr.
K.Nageswara Naidu Versus Collector And District Magistrate Kadapa
Mallada K Sri Ram Vs. State Of Telangana
Munagala Yadamma V. State Of Andhra Pradesh And Ors.
Pushker Mukherjee Vs. State Of West Bengal
Ram Manohar Lohia Vs. State Of Bihar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.