IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Sandeep N. Bhatt, J.
The Chikhli Education Society Through Chetanbhai Dhirubhai Desai & others – Applicants
Versus
State of Gujarat & others – Respondents
R/Criminal Misc. Application No. 6416 of 2018
Decided On : 11-01-2024
Public Trust - Violation of Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 35, 36, 66, 83
Fact of the Case:
The Chikhli Education Society, a registered Trust, sought permission to construct and sell shops on its land. The Trust obtained initial permission for 18 shops, constructed 8, and sold them, earning over Rs. 1 crore. It sought further permission for additional construction, which was pending. A criminal complaint was filed against the Trust and trustees for violating Section 35 of the Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Trust had violated Section 35 by incurring additional construction costs without prior permission. The court noted a clear breach of the Act and upheld the prosecution against the Trust and trustees. The court emphasized the need for compliance with the Act's provisions and the duty of trustees to act in accordance with the law.
Issues: Violation of Section 35 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, breach of initial permission, pending permission for additional construction, and the prosecution of the Trust and trustees.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Trust's actions constituted a breach of Section 35, emphasizing the duty of trustees to act in accordance with the law and the need for compliance with the Act's provisions. The court upheld the prosecution against the Trust and trustees, emphasizing the statutory duty of the police to investigate cognizable offences and the need for courts to refrain from interfering with ongoing investigations.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the application and allowed the criminal case to proceed, directing the concerned trial court to decide the matter expeditiously.
ORDER :
1. The present application is filed for seeking the following main reliefs:
(B) Your Lordships be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned complaint bearing Criminal Inquiry No. 19 of 2016 filed by respondent No.2 herein in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chikhli, for the offence punishable under Sections 66 for the violation of Section 35 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 and the process issued thereon by the Ld JMFC, Chikhli vide order dated 02/12/2016 (Annexure A);
(C) Pending hearing, admission and final hearing of this application, Your Lordships may be pleased to stay the proceedings of impugned complaint bearing Criminal Inquiry No.19 of 2016 filed by respondent No.2 herein in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chikhli, for the offence punishable under Sections 66 for the violation of Section 35 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 (Annexure A;
(D) Your Lordships be pleased to pass any other appropriate and just order/s in favour of the applicants;”
2. Brief facts of the case as per the applicants in this application are as such that the Chikhli Education Society is a Trust registered under the Trust Act. It is imparting the education and one of the oldest Trust in the Navsari District in the field of education. It is registered with the in the Office of the Charity Commissioner being Registration No.F2/Navsari. The Trust is running four education schools. The Trust has a school from Jr. Kg to 7 Standard, another School from 8 to 12, another education institution running the course of I.T.I and other educational institution imparting the education in the field of computer education. There are 3500 students and there are 140 employees. It is further the case of the applicants in this application that the Trust is an owner of a land bearing Block No.878 Paiki situated in Samroli Gram Panchayat on a Bilimora- Vansda State Highway. The Managing Committee of the Chikhli Education Society passed the Resolution dated 15.05.2001 to construct 18 shops upon the said land for the purpose of sale. The resolution itself says that the Trust can have the financial benefit by selling the shops. It was resolved to get the necessary permission from the office of the Charity Commissioner and the authority is entrusted to the Trustee. It is further the case of the applicants in this application that the Chikhli Education Society made the application trough its authorized officer under Section 35 of the Act for the construction of 18 shops upon the land in question. The application states the approximate cost of construction is Rs.13,40,000/- for constructing 18 shops. The permission is sought for making the investment for construction in the office of the Charity Commissioner.
It is further the case of the applicants in this application that the Joint Charity Commissioner, vide order dated 05.10.2001 has granted the permission to make an investment in the construction of 18 shops for Rs.13,14,000/- on the two fold conditions. Firstly, that the necessary permission under Section 36 is to be taken before creating any third party interest upon the said construction and secondly upon the construction, necessary change report is to be filed by the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Navsari. It is further the case of the applicants in this application that Chikhli Education Society passed the Resolution dated 01.12.2001 to get the permission from the Joint Charity Commissioner under Section 36 for the sale of eight shops. It is further the case of the applicants in this application that the Chikhli Education Society through its Trustee made the application to the Joint Charity Commissioner to grant the permission under Section 36 for the sale of eight shops. It is further the case of the applicants in this application that the Joint Charity Commissioner, Surat Division Surat, vide ord
The duty of trustees to act in accordance with the law, compliance with statutory provisions, and the need for courts to refrain from interfering with ongoing investigations.
Trustees must comply with legal requirements for property management; failure to do so constitutes serious misconduct warranting removal.
Section 2(13) of the Trusts Act when the petitioner Society is registered under the Societies Registration Act and the same is registered for charitable purposes, it is deemed to be a charitable Trus....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Charity Commissioner's decision to grant consent for instituting the civil suit was based on subjective satisfaction and fulfilled all pro....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for objective consideration of the trust's decision to sell property under section 36(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950, and....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the necessity for a transparent process in disposing of Trust property and the Charity Commissioner's role in verifying the genuine need for sellin....
The Charity Commissioner has the authority to invite fresh offers for the sale of trust property, but must provide adequate reasoning for such actions, particularly when a valid bidding process has a....
The supervisory authority’s power under the act to issue directions for 'proper administration' is restricted to the protection and management of trust property and income. It does not empower the au....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.