Back
VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
Meghubha Mulsangji Zala – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
1. By way of present writ-application filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant herein has prayed for the following reliefs :-
(B) That the Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to renew fire-arm license no. 1/18 belonging to the petitioner Marked at Annex. “C”
C) For such other and further reliefs as the Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case;”
2. Brief facts leading to the filing of the present writ-application read thus :-
The writ-applicant is a retired Dy. S.P. Officer and is currently working as an agriculturalist. The writ-applicant also owns agricultural lands in Gujarat. It is submitted that the writ-applicant requires firearm license for protection of crop as lot of damage is caused to the crops by the animals. The writ
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the refusal of a firearm license renewal should be based on valid grounds as per the provisions of the Arms Act and should have a nexus to ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the refusal of firearm license renewal must align with the conditions stipulated in the Arms Act, and reasons for refusal must be in accord....
Merely refusing to issue a licence for a reason not prohibited by the Act, such as being aged 63 years, is unjustified and not in consonance with the provisions of the Act.
Age alone cannot be a reason to deny an arms license, and subjective reasons given by authorities must be justified under the provisions of the Arms Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
