JUDGMENT :

Heard learned senior advocate Mr. Shalin Mehta with learned advocate Ms. Samta V. Patel for the petitioner and learned AGP Mr. Jay Trivedi for the respondent-State.

1.1 Though the notices are served upon private respondent they have chosen to remain absent before this Court when the matter was called out.

2. At the outset upon instructions, learned advocate Ms. Samta Patel makes it clear that though the petitioner is pressing this petition, the petitioner does not press his prayer in respect of order dated 25.10.2016 passed in Tenancy Appeal/SR/62/2009 passed by the Deputy Collector (Land Reform) Gandhinagar.

3. In view of above, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs by way of this petition:

(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and/or certiorari or a writ in the nature of mandamus and/or certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction be issued for quashing and setting aside the orders dated 9.2.1962 passed in tenancy case no. 374 by Mamlatdar and Krushipanch Kalol and order dated 5.7.2011 passed in Ganot/Appeal/SR/31/2008 by the Deputy Collector (Land Reform) Gandhinagar, order dated 16.7.2014 passed in Revision Application No