M. K. THAKKER
Salimbhai Ilyasbhai Vora – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal is filed by the appellant-original complainant under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘the Cr.P.C.’ referred hereinafter) challenging the impugned judgment and order of acquittal dated 07.10.2023 passed in Criminal Case No.588 of 2013 by the learned 2nd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Anand.
2. It is the case of the complainant that the complainant was doing business of transportation and the accused had conveyed that he is the owner of the vehicles which were hired for transportation of cotton bundle from P.B.M Polytex Ltd, Cochin, Kerala. An advance amount was paid to the accused of Rs.1,26,000/- towards the rent which was misused by the respondent-accused. On demanding the cheque amount as instead of depositing with the vehicle owner, he had utilized it for his personal expenses. The cheque bearing no. 023325 for an amount of Rs.80,000/- was issued in favour of the complainant being namely South India Roadlines and on discerning the same, after following the due procedure under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (‘the N.I. Act’ referred hereinafter), a private complaint came to be filed being Criminal Case No.588 of 2013.
3. The
The discretion under Section 256 of Cr.P.C should be exercised judiciously and fairly, considering the necessity of the complainant's presence and the principles of natural justice.
The discretion to acquit a defendant due to the complainant's absence must be exercised judicially and fairly, and the court should ensure that the matter is decided on its merits.
The court emphasized the need for the trial court to exercise discretion judiciously and fairly before dismissing a case on technical grounds and highlighted the importance of providing opportunities....
The discretion under Section 256 of the Cr.P.C. must be exercised judicially and fairly, and the trial court should adjourn the case or issue a warrant/summons to the accused instead of immediately d....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of judicial and fair exercise of discretion under Section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, emphasizing the necessity of the co....
The discretion under Section 256 of the Cr.P.C. must be exercised judicially and fairly, without impairing the cause of administration of criminal justice.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of judicial and fair exercise of discretion under Section 256 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, ensuring that the cause of admin....
The importance of ensuring natural justice and giving both parties an opportunity to present their evidence, even in cases of non-appearance, and the need to avoid technical dismissals.
The court emphasized the need for a judicial and fair exercise of discretion in dismissing a complaint for non-appearance of the complainant, stating that the complaint should not be dismissed on a s....
Judicial discretion must be exercised in dismissing complaints for non-appearance, as personal attendance is not always required.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.