SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 257

A. S. SUPEHIA, VIMAL K. VYAS
Anuj @ Sonu Murlidhar Varma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. P V Patadiya
For the Respondent: Mr. Ronak Raval, Public Prosecutor

JUDGMENT :

A.S. SUPEHIA, J.

1. Since, both the appeals arise out of a common judgment and order, with the consent of the learned Advocates for the parties, the same are taken-up for hearing together and being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. The present appeals, filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in brief, ‘the Code’), are emanating from the judgment and order dated 05.02.2014, passed by 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Bharuch at Ankleshwar (‘trial Court’, hereinafter), in Sessions Case No.38 of 2013 (Old Sessions Case No.111 of 2018), whereby, the trial Court has convicted the appellants-original accused Nos.1 and 2 for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, ‘IPC’) and sentenced them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- and in case of default, to undergo further simple imprisonment for six months.

3. As per the charge, Exh.4, total four persons were arraigned as accused. However, the concerned trial Court acquitted the original accused No.3-Pravin Ramaashray Yadav and accused No.4- Dharmendra Bansidhar Shah, at the end of trial by giving them the benefit of d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top