M. K. THAKKER
Jaysinghani Vishal Murlidhar Proprietor of Bharti Trends – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1.This appeal is filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘the Cr.P.C.’ hereinafter) by the appellant-original complainant challenging the judgment and order of acquittal passed in Criminal Case No.10180 of 2020 dated 17.08.2023 by the learned 19th Additional Senior Civil Judge and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Surat acquitting the respondent-accused from the charges punishable under Section 138 of the N.I.Act.
2. It is the case of the complainant that the complainant is the proprietor of Bharti Trends and doing the business of cloth trading. The accused is doing the business in the name and style of Liladhar Saris. The accused had contacted the complainant and requested to make trading in purchasing the goods from the other vendors and assured that in the prescribed time the amount would be paid and if not paid within a time then the same would be paid with late payment charges. The complainant had sent the goods from Shivam Dried House Private Limited and AAA Creation and Tej Fabrics to the accused and along with the goods the challans were also sent along with the bills.
3. On receiving the bills, the cheque bearing No.000066 dated 20.01.2
The accused must discharge the evidential burden to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and fair and judicious procedure is essential in cases under S....
Dishonour of cheque – Whereas prosecution must prove guilt of an accused beyond all reasonable doubt, standard of proof so as to prove a defence on part of accused is preponderance of probabilities.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the rebuttable nature of statutory presumptions under the Negotiable Instruments Act, particularly in cases of dishonoured cheques, and the burden ....
The presumptions under sections 138 and 139 of the NI Act favor the holder, shifting the burden to the accused to rebut the claims of liability.
The presumption in favor of the complainant under the N.I. Act is rebuttable, and the standard of proof required to prove a defense in a criminal case is preponderance of probabilities.
The presumption of liability under the NI Act is rebuttable, and the burden of proof lies on the complainant to establish the existence of a legally enforceable debt.
The complainant must establish the existence of a legally enforceable debt to sustain a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the significance of the accused raising a probable defense to rebut the presumption under Section 139 of the N.I. Act, and the requirement for the ....
Admission of cheque execution triggers Sections 118/139 NI Act presumptions of debt; burden on accused to rebut by evidence; trial acquittal ignoring presumption and shifting onus to complainant is p....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the presumption under Section 118 and Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the burden of proof on the accused to rebut the presumption, a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.