JUDGMENT :

1. Rule. Learned counsel for the respective respondents waive service. Considering the controversy involved in the matter, with the consent of the learned counsel for the respective parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing today.

2. This Criminal Misc. Application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) is filed to quash the FIR being II-C.R. No. 183 of 2017 registered with Vidhyanagar Police Station, District: Anand.

3. Heard, the learned senior counsel Mr. I. H. Syed, assisted by Mr. C. B. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. K. J. Panchal, learned counsel for the second respondent, who is the de facto complainant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Ms. Jyoti Bhatt for the respondent – State.

4. The second respondent is the Vice Chancellor of the Sardar Patel University. He lodged a report with the police stating that on 22.12.2017 at 4:30 p.m. that the petitioners herein, who are four accused in the said case, came to his office and insisted him to disclose the names of the members of the Interview Board. When he stated that he would furnish the details later on that the petitioners got enraged and entered into verbal alte