Nirmil Jitendrabhai Shah vs State Of Gujarat

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Guj) 384

J. C. DOSHI
Nirmil Jitendrabhai Shah – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :MR SHALIN MEHTA, SR. ADVOCATE WITH MR DIPEN DESAI
For the Respondent: MR BHARGAV BHATT WITH MR KISHAN R CHAKWAWALA, MR SIDDHARTH J DESAI, MR. MANAN S DOSHI, MR HK PATEL, MR ANKIT MODI

Table of Content
1. introductory facts of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments for and against anticipatory bail (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's analysis of the bail applications (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
4. judicial principles concerning successive bail applications (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
5. conclusion regarding the cancellation of bail (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43)

JUDGMENT :

1. Since complainant and the accused in both the matters are same, with the consent of learned advocates for the respective parties, both the matters are decided analogously.

2. By way of filing Criminal Misc. Application No.15704 of 2022 u/s 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short “the Code”), the petitioner – original complainant Nirmil Shah prays to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to accused Karan Devendrabhai Rabari and Arjun Devendrabhai Rabari in Criminal Misc. Application No.2112 of 2022 by the learned Sessions Court. Whereas, by way of filing Criminal Misc. Application No.8424 of 2023, the petitioner complainant seeks cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to accused Ka

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(Guj) 384

J. C. DOSHINirmil Jitendrabhai Shah – AppellantVersusState Of Gujarat – Respondent

Cases Referred (21)

J. C. DOSHI
Nirmil Jitendrabhai Shah – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent