IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J.C. DOSHI, J.
Niravbhai Bhulabhai Patel – Appellants
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
R/Criminal Misc.Application (For Anticipatory Bail) No.19720 of 2023
Decided on : 09-04-2024
Anticipatory Bail - Criminal Procedure - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 438 - C.R.No.I-11822004220566 of 2022 - C.R.No.11822004230689 of 2023 - C.R.No.11822004220560 of 2022 - C.R.No.11822004220561 of 2022
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with an FIR registered against him for his alleged involvement in inciting a mob and disrupting law and order, including provoking Adivasi people, ransacking a shop, and damaging public property.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner played a major role in inciting the mob and disrupting law and order, as evidenced by multiple FIRs and charge-sheet filed against him. The court also noted that the petitioner is absconding and has a history of involvement in similar offenses.
Issues: The main issues revolved around the petitioner's alleged involvement in inciting a mob, disrupting law and order, and damaging public property, as well as his request for anticipatory bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the principles established in various judgments, including the nature and gravity of the accusation, the antecedents of the petitioner, the possibility of fleeing from justice, and the impact of granting anticipatory bail in cases affecting a large number of people. The court also considered the petitioner's history of involvement in similar offenses and his absconding status.
Final Decision: The court denied the petitioner's request for anticipatory bail, citing his active role in the alleged offenses, his absconding status, and the established legal principles governing the grant of anticipatory bail.
ORDER :
1. By way of the present petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in case of his arrest in connection with the FIR registered as C.R.No.I-11822004220566 of 2022 registered with Khergam Police Station.
2. Facts of the case are as under :-
The alleged incident is alleged to have taken place on October 08, 2022 at 18.30 hours and lasted till 02.00 am on October 09, 2022. In the First Information Report 29 persons have been named as accused with mob of 1500-2000 persons. The said First Information Report is given by one Shakuntla Maal Police Sub- Inspector, Leave Reserve, Navsari. The first informant alleged that on October 08, 2022 when she was at her duty as In-charge of Khergam Police Station, at about 19.10 hours, she was informed by unarmed police constable Me Mitesh Ramesh posted in LIB Branch of Khergam Police Station that there is quarrel between Mr. Anantbhai Patel within their jurisdiction and sald incident has been circulated in Whatsapp. The said facts of the alleged assault of Mr. Anantbhai Patel was widely circulated in social media, therefore, the first informant inquired from other police staff to verify about the incident of the quarrel with the MLA who confirmed the assault on MLA and also found that MLA and his supporters are agitating on reads and closed the roads and therefore, proceeded towards the area of incident where she found after reaching the market Dashera Tekri that the road was found to be have been blocked and the MLA and 18 other persons have been identified and named in the First Information Report along with 1500-2000 people consisted of mob. She further stated that when she reached near the place, there were nearly 200-300 persons of scheduled tribes who were instigating the people and said that it is not assault on Mr. Anantbhai Patel but it is an assault on the schedule tribe community. The first informant further stated that the first informant summoned the other police force and also informed the said facts to immediate superiors. After arrival of other polisse salt, the test Informant approached Mr. Patel and was informed what has happened and what is his complaint. When the firs informant reached near Mr.Anantbhai Patel, mob become agitated and started chanting slogans. The mob was informed that the first informant was there to record the complaint. The Sarpanch of Khergam Zarnaben Patel was also present who also requested Mr. Anantbhai Patel that the police has arrived to record the complaint of Mr. Anantbhai Patel, however, refused to give the complaint and said police is not required and they will do justice by themselves. The first informant further stated that the election of legislative assembly was round the corner and therefore, so as to take undue political advantage, the mob could go to any extent and therefore, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Navsari was also informed about the said fact. On receiving the information, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Navsari, Deputy Superintendent of Police, ST/SC Cell, Mr. Korat PI, Mr. Karen CPI were informed about the said incident and summoned the police. Since, the mob grew, the Mamlatdar had also arrived at the place who has also requested Mr. Anantbhai Patel to lodged his complaint before the police and police was ready to take the complaint. The mob had become unruly and assaulted the police and damaged the properties. Hence, impugned FIR is filed.
3. Heard learned advocate for the petitioner/accused and learned APP for the State.
4. Learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely involved in the offence. Offence is registered as counter-blast to the FIR filed by the sitting MLA Mr.Anand Patel vide C.R.No.11822004220551 of 2022 dated 09.10.2022. It is submitted that since the petitioner is follower of sitting MLA Mr. Anand Patel, who belongs to other than ruling party, ergo to harass the petitioner, one
Abhishek vs. State of Maharastra reported in 2022 (8) SCC 282
Lavesh vs. (NCT of Delhi) reported in (2012) 8 SCC 730
State of Haryana vs. Dharamraj reported in 2023 INSC 784
SIDHHARAM SATLINGAPPA MEHTRE V/s. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA reported in - 2011(1) GLH 11
The court's decision underscores the importance of considering the nature and gravity of the accusation, the petitioner's antecedents, and the impact of granting anticipatory bail in cases affecting ....
The court's decision underscored the importance of evaluating the accused's role, antecedents, and the genuineness of the prosecution when considering anticipatory bail applications.
The court emphasized that anticipatory bail should be granted only in exceptional cases, considering the gravity of accusations and the accused's history, particularly when public order is at risk.
Anticipatory bail is an extraordinary remedy that should be granted sparingly, especially in serious cases, and requires strict compliance with court-imposed conditions.
Anticipatory bail can be denied if the applicant fails to comply with court orders and conditions, especially in serious cases involving multiple FIRs.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the High Court should be cautious in interfering with the investigation or trial of a criminal case and should not stall the investigation, ex....
Anticipatory bail should only be granted under exceptional circumstances; the court must consider the nature of accusations, the applicant's history, and potential risks to public safety and the inve....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.