Back
NIKHIL S. KARIEL
Maulik Bharatbhai Mandir – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned Advocate Mr.Anand Gogia for the petitioner and learned AGP Ms.Nidhi Vyas for the respondent State.
2. Issue Rule returnable forthwith. Learned AGP waives service of Rule for the respondent State.
3. By way of this petition, the petitioner has sought the following main prayers :-
B. Your Lordship may be pleased to issue writ of appropriate nature, direction and orders setting aside the impugned order No.Aaraa. ja-102006-1661-Chh(d) dated 10.4.2019 which is annexed at Annexure-A and the respondent Authorities may please be directed to issue and release appointment order to petitioner on suitable post with the retrospective effect i.e. date of application for appointment along with all consequential benefits of pension, service, seniority, pay fixation, arrears etc.
C. Your Lordships may be pleased to direct the respondent Authorities to offer to the petitioner the appointment on any suitable Class-III post-”C” group.”
4. It is the case of the petitioner that his late father was working as an Education Inspector in the Mid-day Meal Scheme with the respondent No.2 herein and whereas he had
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to consider the relevant rules and policies at the time of the employee's demise and the applicant's first application for compa....
Compassionate appointment - Government Resolution - Petitioner was 8th standard pass and educational qualification at relevant point of time was 4th standard pass and subsequently he acquired qualifi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the rejection of a claim for compassionate appointment after 11 years, when the petitioner had already applied for compassionate appointment i....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of OM dtd. 1/6/2015 in compassionate appointment cases, specifically the time limit for considering pending applications and the im....
Compassionate appointment is an exception and a concession, not a right, and should be made strictly in accordance with the rules. Long delays can lead to the rejection of compassionate appointments.
Compassionate appointment claims governed by rules on date of consideration, not death; married son ineligible under SRO-120 amendment applicable to pending cases; age/qualification shortfalls bar re....
Compassionate appointment time limit for minors computed from attaining majority, not father's death.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
