IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
A.S. SUPEHIA, MAUNA M. BHATT, JJ.
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
RUPAL DINESH PATEL – Respondent
Letters Patent Appeal No. 1262 of 2024, Special Civil Application No. 15235 of 2021, Civil Application (For Stay) No. 1 of 2024
Decided On : 08-08-2024
Pension - Retirement Benefits - Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2002 - The court interpreted Rule 25 regarding qualifying service, affirming that service on an ad-hoc basis can count towards pension eligibility, influencing the decision to grant the respondent retirement benefits.
Fact of the Case:
The respondent, appointed as a lecturer on an ad-hoc basis, served for over 23 years before being discharged. She sought pension and retirement benefits, which were denied by the appellant, leading to a legal challenge.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the respondent's long service, despite being ad-hoc, qualified her for pension benefits under the applicable rules, as her service was continuous and in a sanctioned post.
Issues: Whether the respondent, having served on an ad-hoc basis, is entitled to pension and retirement benefits under the Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2002.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that ad-hoc service can be considered qualifying service for pension purposes, as per Rule 25 of the Pension Rules, thus entitling the respondent to benefits.
Result: The appeal was rejected, upholding the order to grant pension and retirement benefits to the respondent.
ORDER :
1. This appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment dated 04.01.2024 in Special Civil Application No. 15235 of 2021, wherein the learned Single Judge has allowed the petition directing the appellants to pay to the respondent compensation pension and other corresponding retirement benefits based on the qualifying services put in by her within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the order. It is further directed that the appellant shall also pay the arrears of pension and other retirement benefits to the respondent from the date of her discharge within the period directed.
2. The facts in brief emanating from the record are as under:
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms. Shruti Dhruve for the appellant-State submitted that since the respondent has rendered her service on adhoc basis, she would not be entitled for benefit of family pension.
4. On the other hand, learned advocate for the respondent-original petitioner submitted that the employee who was working on adhoc basis is entitled for family pension, as per Rule 25 of the Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2002 (for short ‘the Rules’). In support of her submissions, she has relied upon the judgment dated 07.05.2019 passed in Special Civil Application No. 19042 of 2017 and also on the order dated 18.10.2019 passed in Special Civil Application No. 20185 of 2018, which has been confirmed up to the Apex Court. She has further submitted that as per the Family Pension Rules and as per the Government Resolution dated 11.05.1990, if an employee before his death has completed 5 years’ service, is entitled for family pension and since the respondent had completed more than 5 years of service, she would be entitled to the family pension. Thus, it is urged that no interference is called for in the order of Learned Single Judge.
5. Having heard learned advocates for the respective parties, it is noticed that the respondent completed approximately 23 years of service with the appellant-State as an adhoc lecturer and since her services were discontinued, the same was subject matter of chal
Ad-hoc service can qualify for pension benefits under the Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2002, if the service is continuous and in a sanctioned post.
Ad hoc services can be considered as qualifying service for pensionary benefits under Rule 25 of the Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2002.
Ad hoc service can qualify for family pension if the employee has completed over five years of service, as per the Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2002.
Once it is settled that the ad hoc service, which has been made basis of regularization, has been considered in catena of judgments and it has been held that the same is countable for reckoning the q....
Temporary services, including interrupted periods, are eligible for pensionary benefits under Rule 25 of the Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2002.
petitioner has rendered qualifying pensionery service with effect from the date of his initial joining in the department in question, so the same shall be treated as service qualifying for pension an....
Ad hoc services should be counted for calculating qualifying service for pension and gratuity as per the Uttar Pradesh Palika (Centralised) Services Retirement Benefit Rules, 1981.
The delay in appointment due to the inaction of the respondents should not deprive an employee of the benefit of adhoc service as qualifying service for pensionary benefits under Rule 3.17-A(a) of th....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.