ILESH J. VORA, VIMAL K. VYAS
Jitubhai Chhotalal Parmar Thru His Daughter In Law Trupti Parthbhai Parmar – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Police, Ahmedabad City – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL K. VYAS)
1. The present petition is directed against the order of detention dated 03.04.2024 passed by the respondent – detaining authority in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 (for short ‘the Act’), whereby the respondent - detaining authority has detained the petitioner - detenue as defined under Section 2(c) of the Act.
2. Heard the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner – detenue and learned AGP appearing for the respondent – State.
3. Learned advocate for the petitioner - detenue submits that the impugned order of detention is required to be quashed and set-aside since the detaining authority has passed the order of detention solely on the ground of registration of three FIRs; (i) for the offences under Sections 325, 294B, 114 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 135(1) of the Gujarat Police Act; (ii) for the offences under Sections 324, 325, 143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 323, 294B, 337 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135(1) of the G.P. Act; (iii) for the offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 323, 294B, 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Se
Vijay Narain Singh vs. State of Bihar
Shaik Nazneen vs. The State of Telanga and others
Dr.Ram Manohar Lohia vs. State of Bihar
Mallada K. Sri Ram vs. The State of Telangana & Ors. 2022 6 SCALE 50
Mallada K. Sri Ram vs. The State of Telangana
Syed Sabeena vs. The State of Telangana and others
Pushkar Mukherjee and others vs. The State of West Bengal
K.Nageswara Naidu vs. Collector and District Magistrate, Kadapa
Preventive detention must demonstrate a clear threat to public order, not merely rely on the existence of FIRs.
Preventive detention must be based on substantial evidence showing a threat to public order, not merely on the existence of criminal charges.
Preventive detention must be based on substantial evidence showing a threat to public order, not merely on the existence of criminal charges.
Preventive detention cannot be justified solely on the basis of FIRs; there must be a clear and direct impact on public order.
Preventive detention cannot be justified solely on the basis of FIRs; there must be a demonstrable threat to public order.
Preventive detention must demonstrate a clear threat to public order, not merely rely on criminal charges.
Preventive detention must be based on substantial evidence showing a threat to public order, not merely on the existence of criminal charges.
Preventive detention must be based on substantial evidence showing a threat to public order, not merely on the existence of criminal charges.
Preventive detention must be based on a clear threat to public order, not merely on the existence of criminal charges.
Preventive detention must be based on substantial evidence showing a threat to public order, not merely on the existence of criminal charges.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.