Back
BHARGAV D. KARIA, NIRAL R. MEHTA
Vaishno Polymers – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
ORDER :
BHARGAV D. KARIA, J.
1. Heard learned advocate Mr.Hardik P.Modh for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr.Utkarsh R.Sharma for the respondent nos.2 and 3.
2. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:
(b) That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari, or a Writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, calling for the records related to Order-In- Original No.MCH/DC/MK/666/2020-21 dated 31.12.2020 (Annexure Q), Order-In-Original No. MCH/DC/MK/666A/2020-21 dated 31.12.2020 (Annexure R), and Order-In-Original No.MCH/DC/MK/666B/2020-21 dated 31.12.2020 (Annexure S), and af
Administrative decisions must adhere to principles of natural justice, ensuring parties have the opportunity to present their case.
Exemption claimants bear proof burden, but authorities must grant opportunity before adverse GST orders.
Ex-parte GST assessment order on exempt petroleum products set aside; remanded for fresh consideration without deposit.
The court held that an exporter must clarify IGST obligations related to re-imported goods and establish any claimed input tax credits appropriately.
Exporters are entitled to IGST refunds despite claiming higher duty drawback rates, reinforcing the principle of coherent refund applications.
Remand for fresh GST assessment granting opportunity to substantiate exemption claim with documents.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a petitioner is entitled to an IGST refund for zero-rated supply exports under the relevant provisions of the IGST Act and CGST Act, despite a....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
