VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
Amrutlal Mulchandas Patel – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER :
Draft amendment dated 02.07.2024 is taken on record and the same is allowed. To be carried out forthwith.
1. Heard Mr. Mihir Joshi, learned Senior Counsel appearing with Mr. Dipen Desai, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner and Ms. Manisha L. Shah, learned Additional Advocate General appearing with Mr. Jay Trivedi and Ms. Nidhi Vyas, learned AGP appearing for the respondent – State.
2. The Special Civil Application No.8831 of 2024 is preferred by the members of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (for short ‘APMC’), Unjha and the Special Civil Application No.8833 of 2024 is preferred through the Chairman of the APMC, Unjha. The dispute involved in both the petitions is analogous and identical and in view thereof, both the petitions are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
2.1 The facts of both the petitioners are identical and in view thereof, Special Civil Application No.8831 of 2024 is treated as the lead matter and facts of the said petition are reproduced herein.
3. By way of captioned petitions, the petitioners herein have prayed for a direction qua the respondent authorities more particularly, the respondent No.2 herein to declare an
Abdulgani Abdulbhai Kureshi vs. State of Gujarat reported in 1992 (1) GLR 503
Jitendrasinh Manjisinh Vaghela vs. State of Gujarat reported in 2016 (2) GLR 1216
Mehsana District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs. Merda Seva Sahakari Mandali Ltd.
The State has discretion under the Gujarat Act to either extend the term of market committee members or appoint an Administrator after the term expires, depending on the existence of valid reasons fo....
The discretion to grant extension of the term of office for members of the APMC under Section 14(3) of the Act, 1963 should be exercised judiciously and reasonably, and the right to hold office is no....
The State Government's discretionary powers to extend the term of APMCs must be exercised in a fair and impartial manner, supported by valid reasons, and based on a policy decision considering the im....
The tenure of elected municipal councillors is strictly five years as per constitutional mandate, with no provisions for extensions despite interruptions caused by administration appointments.
The tenure of elected municipal councils is fixed at five years without extension, and appointment of Administrators is valid during the interregnum to ensure governance.
The Administrator can be appointed under Section 315 of the Karnataka Municipalities Act when elections are not held before the end of the Municipal Council's five-year term, without violating Articl....
A society's governing body's term is strictly limited to three years; any extension requires new elections rather than relying on financial year definitions, emphasizing the importance of statutory c....
The appointment/continuance of the existing elected body as Administrator after the expiration of their term would be contrary to the mandate of Article 243E of the Constitution and the Maharashtra V....
Reconstitution of Standing Committee and election of a Chairman to Standing Committee - Term of Standing Committee commenced on or from 15th March, 2007 for the purpose of computing the term of offic....
The term of office for Presidents of Municipal Committees is strictly five years from the date of the first meeting, as defined by the Jammu and Kashmir Municipal Act, 2000.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.