Back
VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
Shaikh Malka Ishakbhai – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
ORDER :
(Vaibhavi D. Nanavati, J.) :
1. Heard Mr.Bhuvnesh Gahlot, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners, Ms.Pooja Ashar, learned A.G.P. for the respondent no.3, Mr.Vishrut Jani, learned advocate appearing for R.C. Jani, Associates for the respondent no.4 and Mr.G.H. Virk, learned advocate appearing with Mr.S.H. Virk, learned advocate for respondent nos.5 and 6.
2. Issue Rule, returnable forthwith. Ms.Pooja Ashar, learned A.G.P. waives service of notice of Rule for respondent no.3, Mr.Vishrut Jani, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule for respondent no.4 and Mr.G.H. Virk, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule for respondent nos.5 and 6.
3. By way of the present petition, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:-
B) issue appropriate writ of order or direction and be pleased to quash and set aside the action of the respondent authorities of issuing notice dated 03/07/2023(Annexure-E) whereby the respondent authority has issued notice to 992 flat owners of including present petitioners’ families who have been served with notice to demolish the premises i.e. Sikandar Bakthnagar Shaheri Awas Yojna, Behrampura allotted t
Residents must utilize regulatory frameworks for grievances regarding housing conditions rather than challenge eviction notices directly in court.
The public interest in the redevelopment scheme and the lack of infringement of the petitioners' fundamental or legal rights were the main legal points established in the judgment.
The court determined that unauthorized construction cannot be regularized and emphasized strict compliance with municipal regulations and housing rights, rejecting the claims of the petitioners.
The Court upheld the Assistant Estate Officer's eviction order under the Town Planning Act, confirming that petitioners' objections were unsubstantiated given their failure to challenge the Town Plan....
The court emphasized the necessity of proper notice and adherence to procedural safeguards in administrative actions affecting property rights, ruling the demolition illegal due to failure to follow ....
The court upheld the validity of the redevelopment process under Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973, and directed the respondents to vacate their flats and hand over peaceful and va....
Majority consent in cooperative societies is binding for redevelopment under Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, enabling courts to enforce compliance despite minority objections.
Illegal construction on government land without ownership or permission does not entitle the petitioners to challenge the Corporation's action. The Corporation's offer of alternative accommodation ma....
The court affirmed that unauthorized occupants of land are ineligible for benefits under slum rehabilitation schemes, emphasizing the importance of legal compliance and cooperation with authorities.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
