SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 1738

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI, J.
Shaikh Malka Ishakbhai & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. – Respondents
R/Special Civil Application No. 19443 Of 2023 with Civil Application (For Direction) No. 1 Of 2024
Decided On : 30-08-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Bhuvnesh Gahlot.
For the Respondents: Ms Pooja Ashar AGP, G.H. Virk With Mr S.H. Virk With Ms Nency Sheth, Mr Simranjitsingh H. Virk, Notice Served By DS, Mr. Vishrut Jani for RC Jani & Associate, Served By RPAD (N).

IMPORTANT POINT
Residents must utilize regulatory frameworks for grievances regarding housing conditions rather than challenge eviction notices directly in court.

Headnote:

Notice - Residential Eviction - Gujarat Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Section 265 - The court analyzed the provisions of Section 265 regarding building inspections and the responsibilities of municipal authorities, concluding that the petitioners must seek remedies under the relevant regulations rather than challenge the notice directly.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, residents of a housing scheme, challenged a notice issued by municipal authorities to vacate their premises due to deteriorating building conditions, claiming it violated their right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners did not press the challenge against the notice and that they could seek remedies under the applicable regulations for grievances related to housing conditions.

Issues: Whether the notice issued under Section 265 of the Gujarat Provincial Municipal Corporations Act was valid and if the petitioners had alternative remedies under the relevant regulations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioners should pursue their grievances through the appropriate regulatory framework rather than directly contest the notice, as no immediate eviction or demolition was being enforced.

Result: The petition was disposed of, and the notice was discharged.

ORDER :

(Vaibhavi D. Nanavati, J.) :

1. Heard Mr.Bhuvnesh Gahlot, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners, Ms.Pooja Ashar, learned A.G.P. for the respondent no.3, Mr.Vishrut Jani, learned advocate appearing for R.C. Jani, Associates for the respondent no.4 and Mr.G.H. Virk, learned advocate appearing with Mr.S.H. Virk, learned advocate for respondent nos.5 and 6.

2. Issue Rule, returnable forthwith. Ms.Pooja Ashar, learned A.G.P. waives service of notice of Rule for respondent no.3, Mr.Vishrut Jani, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule for respondent no.4 and Mr.G.H. Virk, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule for respondent nos.5 and 6.

3. By way of the present petition, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:-

    “A) admit this petition;

B) issue appropriate writ of order or direction and be pleased to quash and set aside the action of the respondent authorities of issuing notice dated 03/07/2023(Annexure-E) whereby the respondent authority has issued notice to 992 flat owners of including present petitioners’ families who have been served with notice to demolish the premises i.e. Sikandar Bakthnagar Shaheri Awas Yojna, Behrampura allotted to 992 families under the Jawaharlal Nehru Urban Renewal Mission scheme floated by the Central Government, Constructed by Urban Development and Urban Housing Department, Government of Gujarat for resettlement and rehabilitation of thousands of residents residing at the bank of river Sabarmati for construction of Sabarmarti River Front, allotted by Ahmedabad municipal Corporation, on the ground that the condition of the building blocks has been deteriorated and therefore, if at all any human life is lost due to falling off any building block, then Ahmedabad, municipal corporation will not be held responsible which has been allotted to the petitioners from the year 2010 to 2014 as the same is violative Article 21 of the constitution of India, in the interest of justice;

C) issue appropriate writ of order or direction and be pleased to quash and set aside the notices dated 03/07/2023(Annexure-E) whereby the respondent authority has issued notice to 992 flat owners (where more than 5000 people are residing) including present petitioners’ families who have been served with notice to vacate the premises allotted to 992 families under the Jawaharlal Nehru Urban Renewal Mission scheme floated by the Central Government, Constructed by Urban Development and Urban Housing Department, Government of Gujarat for resettlement and rehabilitation of thousands of residents residing at the bank of river Sabarmati for construction of Sabarmarti River Front, allotted by Ahmedabad municipal Corporation, on the ground that the condition of the building blocks has been deteriorated and therefore, if at all any human life is lost due to falling off any building block, then Ahmedabad, municipal corporation will not be held responsible which has been allotted to the petitioners from the year 2010 to 2014 as the same is violative Article 21 of the constitution of India, in the interest of justice;

D) issue appropriate writ of order or directions upon the respondent authorities to constitute a high level committee and to investigate and initiate disciplinary or appropriate proceedings against the concerned officers/contractors/builders etc. who have constructed the Sikandar Bakthnagar Shaheri Garib Avas Yojna, Behrampura, Ahmedabad with such a building material and in such a fashion that it has became dilapidated with only 10-12 years of handing over possession to the petitioners as well as other citizens who were relocated and rehabilitated from Sabarmati River bank, in the interest of justice; E) issue appropriate writ or order or directions upon the respondent authorities to grant alternate resident in the case, if respondent authorities reconstruct/rebuild the Sikandar Bakthnagar Shaheri Garib AvasYojna, Behrampura, Ahmedabad for the petitioners and other resident of the Sikand

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top