IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Mauna M. Bhatt, J.
Ibrahimbhai Rahimbhai Parbadiya - Appellant
Vs.
The Secretary, State Election Commission & Ors. - Respondent
Special Civil Application No. 22533 of 2022
Decided On : 05-12-2024
(A) Gujarat Panchayat Act, 1993 - Sections 2(33), 9(4), and 16(1) - Constitution of India - Article 243D(1) - Allotment of seats in Village Panchayat - Challenge to the allotment of a seat to Scheduled Tribe in Ward No.8 of Village Karnala based on alleged zero population - Court upheld the allotment as per 2011 census, affirming legal obligations for reservation. (Paras 1, 12, 18)
(B) Legal Principles - Allotment of seats must reflect population as per last census - Non-representation due to zero population invalidates the claim - Legal obligation to reserve seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. (Paras 12, 16)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the allotment of a seat in Gram Panchayat to Scheduled Tribe, arguing there was no population of Scheduled Tribe in the area. (Paras 1-3)
Findings of Court:
The Court found no illegality in the allotment based on the 2011 census data which supported the reservation of seats. (Paras 18)
Issues: Whether the allotment of a seat to Scheduled Tribe in light of the population data was legal.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that the allotment was valid as it adhered to the provisions of the Gujarat Panchayat Act and the Constitution regarding population-based reservations.
Result: Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
1. A social worker as petitioner has filed this petition challenging the decision of respondent No.2 – The Collector dated 03.02.2022, whereby one seat has been allotted to Scheduled Tribe Caste (General) as a member, in Gram Panchayat of Village- Karnala in Ward No.8 of area Mujahidpura, Taluka- Vadgam, District- Banaskantha. It is also prayed that one seat allotted to Scheduled Tribe Cast in ward8 of Village- Karnala, be allotted to any other category instead of Scheduled tribe.
2. It is case of the petitioner that allotment of seat in Ward No.8 in Village: Karnala area of Mujahidpura, to Scheduled Tribe Caste is required to be cancelled because more persons of Scheduled Tribe Caste are not residing or staying in Ward No.8 area of Mujahidpura of Village: Karnala.
3. Facts in brief, as referred in the petition, are as under:
Respondent No.1 – Secretary, State Election Commission in exercise of powers conferred under Article 243(k) read with Section 16 of the Gujarat Panchayat Act, 1993 (“the Act, 1993” for short) issued Notification dated 07.09.1994. Under the said Notification, certain guidelines were issued which are required to be adhered by the Collector of the District while constituting wards of a Village Panchayat. According to the said guidelines, ward of each Village Panchayat shall be constituted in such a manner that population in all the wards shall as far as practicable be equal, in particulars, the population of a ward, shall not vary 10 percent in case of village panchayat from the average ward population of a village Panchayat. The respondent No.1 – Secretary thereafter, by letter dated 10.01.2022 issued guidelines regarding the allotment of seats as per the division of wards in Gram Panchayats. Accordingly, respondent No.2- The Collector by notification dated 03.02.2022 allotted 8 seats to the village: Karnala, Tal: Vadgam, District: Banaskantha. Out of 8 seats, one seat has been allotted to Scheduled tribe caste in Ward No.8 area of Mujahidpura in Village: Karnala. Since there is no population of Scheduled tribe caste residing or staying in Ward No.8 area of Mujahidpura in Village: Karnala, the present petition is filed challenging the decision/notification of respondent No.2-collector dated 03.02.2022.
4. Heard learned advocate Mr.Sunil Shah for the petitioner; learned advocate Ms.Aishvarya for respondent No.1; learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Dhawan Jayswal for respondent No.2 and learned advocate Mr.R.B.Thakor for respondent No.3.
5. Learned advocate Mr.Sunil Shah for the petitioner submitted that Notification dated 03.02.2022 issued by respondent No.2- Collector as State Election Commission Officer is erroneous and illegal because the same is against the Rules and Regulations issued on 10.01.2022. The notification is in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Learned advocate submitted that as referred in the petition, the allotment of seat is to be done as per the division of ward in Gram Panchayat. According to which, 8 seats have been allotted to Ward No.8 area of Mujahidpura of Village: Karnala and out of those 8 seats, one seat has been allotted to Scheduled tribe caste. The said allotment is illegal because there is no population of Scheduled tribe caste people in Village: Karnala area of Mujahidpura and in absence of any population of Scheduled tribe caste people, allotment of 1 seat to the said caste would create non-representation, which is contrary to the intent of the guidelines dated 10.01.2022. Since there is no such population of Scheduled tribe caste, the villagers’ made representation dated 16.02.2022 to the Chief Election Officer, however nothing has been done. Zero population of Scheduled tribe in area of Mujahidpura village Karnala is evident from Gram Panchayat Certificate dated 14.02.2022 (Annexure “D”).
6. Moreover, the respondent has erred in not appreciating that earlier there was a group Gram Panchayat consisting of 11 wards. In the year 2022, divi
The allotment of seats in Village Panchayat must be based on the latest census data, ensuring compliance with legal obligations for reservations for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.
The determination of population for the purpose of reserving seats for marginalized categories in local body elections must be based strictly on the last preceding census as mandated by the Constitut....
Allotment of seats to others-The Election Commission shall after having allotted seat reserved for the Schedule Castes, Schedule Tribes and socially and educationally backward classes under rules 4, ....
The lottery for reservation was conducted in conformity with Rule 9 of the Rules of 1994 and subsequent notifications did not change the constituency of the reserved categories, thus no intervention ....
Point of Law : Article 243L of Constitution, would enable Union Territory to exceptions and modifications from other provisions of Constitution.
The right to contest elections in cooperative societies is statutory, and the court upheld the validity of existing bye-laws regarding seat reservations for S.C./S.T. without mandating specific const....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.