IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Aniruddha P. Mayee, J.
Bhikhiben W/o Hareshbhai Meghrajbhai Chaudhary (Valaganth) & Ors. - Appellant
Vs.
The State Of Gujarat & Ors. - Respondent
Special Civil Application No. 12518 of 2024
Decided On : 26-11-2024
(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Appointment of Guardian - The petitioner sought the appointment of a guardian for an individual in a comatose state due to health complications, asserting the need for management of financial affairs and properties. The Court recognized its jurisdiction under Article 226 to act as parens patriae in such cases, allowing the petition and imposing specific conditions for the guardian's responsibilities. (Paras 9, 10, 11)
(B) Medical Condition - The petitioner's husband is in a comatose state requiring constant care, as confirmed by a medical report. The petitioners face difficulties managing financial affairs due to his condition. (Paras 3, 5, 8)
Facts of the case:
The petitioners, family members of Shri Hareshbhai Meghrajbhai Chaudhary, sought guardianship due to his comatose state after a brain hemorrhage, necessitating assistance in managing his properties and medical care.
Findings of Court:
The Court allowed the petition, appointing the petitioner No.1 as guardian, with conditions to ensure the patient's best interests are maintained and monitored.
Issues: The main issue was whether the Court could appoint a guardian for an individual in a comatose state without explicit legislative enactment.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that it has the authority under Article 226 to appoint a guardian in the absence of legislative provisions, ensuring the welfare of individuals unable to care for themselves.
Result: Writ petition allowed.
JUDGMENT :
Aniruddha P. Mayee, J.
1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. Ms. Nidhi Vyas, learned AGP waives service of rule for the respondents.
2. The present Special Civil Application has been filed praying for the following reliefs:-
(B) YOUR LORDSHIP may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction to hold and declare the petitioner no.1 Bhikhiben Hareshbhai Chaudhary (Valaganth) as a guardian of Shri Hareshbhai Meghrajbhai Chaudhary (Valaganth) and further be pleased to hold and declare that the petitioner no.1 is manager of all three properties mentioned in paragraph no.5 of the petition belonging to Shri Hareshbhai Meghrajbhai Chaudhary (Valaganth).
(C) Pending the issuance of notice, admission and final hearing of the present petition be pleased to direct the concerned respondent or any other sub ordinate officer to submit factual medical report before this Hon'ble Court in connection with the health condition of Shri Hareshbhai Meghrajbhai Chaudhary (Valaganth) within stipulated time as may be decided by this Hon'ble Court.”
3. The brief facts of the petitioners case is that, Shri Hareshbhai Meghrajbhai Chaudhary (Valaganth) is not in a good health since he has suffered Brain Hemorrhage and has undergone treatment, but he is still in comatose stage. Due to the said condition, he is not able to understand any language and requires constant aid and supervision as well as active medical monitoring. It is submitted that the petitioners who are the family members of Shri Hareshbhai Meghrajbhai Chaudhary (Valaganth) are facing difficulties in managing the financial affairs. It is submitted that the petitioner No.1 is a wife of Shri Hareshbhai Meghrajbhai Chaudhary (Valaganth) and petitioner Nos.2 to 4 are their three children. The petitioner No.4 being a minor, is represented by the petitioner No.1, who is his mother. It is further submitted that the petitioners are residing together at the address as mentioned in the cause title of the writ petition.
4. That the petitioners submit that said Shri Hareshbhai Meghrajbhai Chaudhary (Valaganth) has jointly purchased immovable properties in his name which includes,
(2) Survey No.1527 admeasuring hector 0-40-61 and Survey No.1529 paiki admeasuring Hector 0-79-93 situated in the sim of village Vedancha; and
(3) Survey No.1591 admeasuring 0-29-63 Sq. Mts. situated in Palanpur Kasba.
The petitioners have to sale out the aforementioned properties to maintain the family as well as to incur medical expenses of Shri Hareshbhai Meghrajbhai Chaudhary (Valaganth). It is submitted that other partners in the said properties do not have any objection in selling the said properties. In addition, said Shri Hareshbhai Meghrajbhai Chaudhary (Valaganth) is having other joint family properties like agricultural lands, shops, etc. which shall be managed and operated in the best interest of Shri Hareshbhai Meghrajbhai Chaudhary (Valaganth).
5. That this Court had called for the medical report vide order dated 28.8.2024. By affidavit-in-reply dated 23.9.2024, the Collector, Banaskantha has submitted the report of the Chief District Medical Officer, which reads as under:-
6. It is, therefore, submitted that the petitioner No.1 Bhikhiben Hareshbhai Meghrajbhai Chaudhary (Valaganth) be appointed as a Guardian of Shri Hareshbhai Meghrajbhai Chaudhary (Valaganth) and further to hold and declare that the petitioner No.1 is the Manager of all the three properties
The Court can appoint a guardian for an individual in a comatose state under Article 226 of the Constitution, acting as parens patriae to protect the individual's interests.
The court established that it can act as parens patriae to appoint a guardian for a comatose patient when no legislative provisions exist.
Point of law: It shall be the duty of the petitioner – guardian to meet the obligations/duties similar to those as described under Section 15 and to maintain and submit the accounts similar to those ....
The court exercises parens patriae jurisdiction under Article 226 to appoint a guardian for a comatose individual, highlighting the absence of specific legislation for such cases.
The court exercises parens patriae jurisdiction to appoint a guardian for an individual in a vegetative state due to inadequate legal provisions.
The Court established guidelines for appointing a Guardian for individuals in a comatose state, emphasizing medical assessment and allowing the Guardian to manage financial matters.
Point of Law : Transactions in respect of the movable and immovable properties of the patient, by the petitioner - guardian, shall be strictly in accordance with the provisions of law. If the petitio....
Court invokes Art.226 to appoint children as guardians for comatose parent absent specific statutory provisions, prioritizing welfare.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.