BIREN VAISHNAV, MAULIK J. SHELAT
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Pravinbhai Ramjibhai Jogal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Biren Vaishnav, J.)
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant-State under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgement and order of acquittal passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Amreli, in Sessions Case No.99 of 1995 on 20.12.1999. By the aforesaid judgement, the Trial Court has acquitted the respondent-accused of the offenses punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The brief case of the prosecution is that on 30.09.1995, at around 15:00 hours, the accused at his house, had sprinkled kerosene on the deceased Manishaben Pravinbhai-the wife of the accused, causing her death by burns. According to the prosecution, the motive of the accused was that he had a doubt that his wife had an illicit relation with the distant relative. The accused was tried for offenses under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. In pursuance of the investigation, a First Information Report was lodged with the Bagasara Police Station for the offenses punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. During the investigation, several statements were recorded of the witnesses, various panchnamas were drawn including the panchnama of the sc
Rajesh Singh & Others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2011) 11 SCC 444
Bhaiyamiyan Alias Jardar Khan and Another vs. State of Madhya Pradesh reported in (2011) 6 SCC 394
Chandrappa and ors. vs. State of Karnataka reported in (2007) 4 SCC 415
Babu Sahebagouda Rudragoudar and Others vs. State of Karnataka
The appellate court upheld the acquittal due to insufficient evidence, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for clear proof of guilt.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal due to insufficient evidence, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the principle that two reasonable views should not disturb the trial ....
The appellate court upheld the acquittal, emphasizing that acquittals should not be disturbed unless there is clear evidence of guilt, reinforcing the presumption of innocence.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the necessity for clear evidence of guilt in criminal cases.
The appellate court must uphold acquittals unless the trial court's decision is perverse or lacks evidentiary support, reinforcing the presumption of innocence.
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing the necessity of clear evidence for conviction and the presumption of innocence in criminal cases.
The appellate court must uphold a trial court's acquittal unless it is proven to be perverse or unsustainable, emphasizing the presumption of innocence.
Appeal against acquittal – Accused having secured his acquittal, presumption of his innocence is further reaffirmed and strengthened by trial Court.
The appellate court upheld the acquittal, emphasizing that the presumption of innocence remains unless clear evidence of guilt is established, and it should not interfere with the trial court's findi....
The appellate court upheld the acquittal, emphasizing the necessity of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and respecting the presumption of innocence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.