Back
NISHA M. THAKORE
Special Land Acquisition Officer – Appellant
Versus
Jesangbhai Kabhaibhai Since Died Through His Legal Heirs – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Nisha M. Thakore, J.)
1. Heard Ms. Tanushree Shrimal, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the appellants and learned advocate Mr. K.M. Sheth for the respondents-original claimants.
2. The present appeal is filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure at the instance of the State Authorities. The appellants are aggrieved by the impugned judgment and award dated 25.07.2012 passed by learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Bharuch in Land Reference Case No.205 of 2011, whereby the reference court has partly allowed the reference case, holding the original claimants entitled to an amount of Rs.248.12/- per sq. mtrs of the acquired lands as an additional compensation over and above the compensation already awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer. The reference court has also held the claimants entitled to get increase at the rate of 12% interest per annum from the date of publication of notification under Section 4(1) of the Act i.e. 24.04.2008 till the date of the award passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer i.e. up to 03.06.2010 as provided under Section 23(1-A) of the Act. The claimants are
The court ruled that inconsistent treatment of claimants by the State in land acquisition cases constitutes discrimination, affirming the reference court's award of additional compensation.
The court modified the compensation for land acquisition based on equal treatment among claimants from adjoining villages, establishing entitlement to higher compensation.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the Acquiring Authority cannot selectively challenge awards for the same subject parcels of land, based on the principle of non-discriminat....
The court determined that compensation for acquired land must reflect fair market value, aligning with previous awards for similar properties.
Claimants may be awarded a higher compensation than claimed, as established by the Supreme Court in various cases.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of fair compensation for acquired lands based on the prevailing market rate and the evidence presented to establish the market va....
The court ruled that compensation for land acquisition must be consistent across similar jurisdictions, applying a 30% reduction for non-municipal areas.
Compensation in land acquisition must be based on comparative market values and previous adjudications, ensuring fairness and consistency in awards.
The court affirmed that compensation for acquired land should be calculated with a 20% deduction based on established valuation standards, modifying the Reference Court's decision to reflect correct ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
