Back
M. K. THAKKER
Bharatbhai Ramjibhai Rathod – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Executive Engineer, Khambhat Irrigation Sub Division – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M. K. Thakker, J.
1. Rule returnable forthwith.
2. With the consent of both the parties, these petitions are taken up for final hearing. All three petitions are arising out of the same dispute, hence, same is discussed together.
3. This petition is filed under Article 14, 16, 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs:
4. Heard learned advocate Mr.Yogen Pandya for the petitioner and learned AGP Ms.Surbhi Bhati for the State. Learned advocate Mr.Yogen Pandya has submitted that petitioner was appointed as per the details below:
in SCA No.19253 of 2021 in the year 1979,
in SCA No.19253 of 2021 in the year 1979.
5. Learned advocate Mr.Yogen pandya has submitted that the petitioner was appointed on Muster Roll as Permanent Daily Wager Canal Labourer-Chowkidar with respondent no.1 in the year 1983 run by Narmada Water Supply and Resources Department Government of Gujarat. Service of the petitioner was orally terminated from 01.08.1998, 15.07.1998
The court ruled that an undertaking obtained under duress from an employee to waive wage recovery rights is unconscionable and void, reinforcing the principle of equality in bargaining power.
The authority's order under Section 33-C(1) was valid as the employer failed to dispute the existence of a relevant settlement, maintaining wage parity between contractual and regular employees in li....
There may be cases where termination of a daily-wage worker is found to be illegal on the ground that it was resorted to as unfair labour practice or in violation of the principle of last come first ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Tripartite Settlement dated 23.07.2008 was binding on the workmen, and the court did not find grounds to interfere with the decision of th....
Claiming wages - It is proved to the satisfaction of the High Court or Supreme Court that such workman had been employed and had been receiving adequate remuneration during any such period or part th....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the consequences of an illegal closure are statutorily prescribed, and the workmen are entitled to all the benefits under any law for the time....
Under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 'absorption' can be interpreted as 'reinstatement', ensuring workmen are protected from financial hardship during legal proceedings.
Burden of proof in employment disputes shifts to the employer once workmen establish their employment. In cases of termination, statutory compliance is critical.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
