M. K. THAKKER
RAJPIPLA NAGARPALIKA – Appellant
Versus
MANTRI, BHARUCH JILLA AUDHYOGIK KAMDAR SANGH – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.K. THAKKER, J.
1. This petition is filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for following reliefs:
(B) Pending the admission hearing and final disposal of this petition, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to stay the implementation, execution and operation of the award dated 10/03/2017 passed by Industrial Court, Bharuch in Reference (IT) No. 161 of 2001.
(C) Any other and further relief or reliefs to which this Hon'ble Court deemed fit, in the interest of justice; may kindly be granted.”
2. Brief facts arising for the consideration of this petition is as under:
| S. No. | Respondent | Working From | |
Maharashtra SRTC vs. Casteribe Rajya P. Karmchari Sanghatana
U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. vs. Bijli Mazdoor Sangh and Others
The court affirmed that prolonged employment of daily wagers without regularization constitutes unfair labor practice, necessitating their regularization under the Industrial Disputes Act.
The court upheld the Tribunal's order for regularization of workers, finding the Municipality's prolonged employment practices constituted unfair labor practices under the Industrial Disputes Act.
The court upheld the Tribunal's order for regularization of employees, citing unfair labor practices by the Municipality in retaining them on temporary wages despite available posts.
The court affirmed that failing to regularize employees engaged in continuous work constitutes unfair labor practice under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
The court upheld the Tribunal's awards for employee regularization, emphasizing the prohibition of unfair labor practices under the Industrial Disputes Act, while clarifying the need for state approv....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the municipality's actions constituted unfair labor practice, justifying the regularisation of the respondent-workman's service. The court emp....
The obligation of the employer to regularise the service of workmen and the prohibition against unfair labour practices under Section 25T of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the employer's failure to fill permanent posts and continuing to employ workers on a temporary basis amounts to unfair labour practice, as ....
The obligation of the employer to accommodate the workman, the power of the Labour Court to grant relief, and the legal principles related to unfair labour practices and regularisation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.