HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA, HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK, JJ
MAYURIBEN W/O MAHESHBHAI PATEL THROUGH RAKESHKUMAR S/O. VASANTBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE SURAT – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK, J.
1. The petitioner herein came to be preventively detained vide the detention order dated 31.12.2024 passed by the Police Commissioner, Surat as a bootlegger as defined under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 (herein after referred as ‘the Act of 1985).
2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of the aforesaid order.
3. This Court has heard learned counsel Mr. Barejia and Ms. Krina P. Calla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State.
4. Learned advocate for the detenue submits that the grounds of detention has no nexus to the “public order”, but is a purely a matter of law and order, as registration of the offence cannot be said to have either affected adversely or likely to affect adverse the maintenance of public order as contemplated under the explanation sub-section (4) of Section 3 of the Act of 1985 and therefore, where the offences alleged to have been committed by the detunue have no bearing on the question of maintenance of public order and his activities could be said to be a prejudicial only to the maintenance of law and order and not prej
Preventive detention requires a clear link between alleged activities and public order; mere law and order issues do not suffice.
Preventive detention requires a clear demonstration that activities adversely affect public order, not merely law and order.
Preventive detention requires a clear nexus to public order, not merely law and order; insufficient evidence leads to quashing of detention orders.
Preventive detention under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act requires that the detainee's activities must adversely affect public order, not merely law and order.
Preventive detention requires substantial evidence that activities affect public order, not merely law and order, as established in prior case law.
Preventive detention requires that the activities of the individual must adversely affect public order, not merely law and order.
Preventive detention requires that activities must adversely affect public order, not just law and order, to justify detention under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act.
Preventive detention requires a clear impact on public order, not merely law and order disturbances, to be legally justified.
Preventive detention requires a clear demonstration that the detainee's actions adversely affect public order, not merely law and order.
Preventive detention requires a clear connection between alleged activities and public order; mere law and order issues do not justify detention under the Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.