SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 237

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
PATEL SURESHBHAI KANTILAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR FB BRAHMBHATT(1016) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

ORDER :

1. Learned counsel for the applicants, on instructions, does not press this application qua applicant Nos.1 and 3 – Patel Sureshbhai Kantilal and Patel Pravinbhai Mohanbhai. Hence, present application stands disposed of as not pressed qua applicant Nos.1 and 3. It is clarified that, applicant Nos.1 and 3 are at liberty to take appropriate recourse under the law. If any application is filed before the concerned authority/Court, the same shall be decided independently, on its own merits, without being influenced by the observations made in this order.

2. RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent – State of Gujarat and Mr. Janak Raval waives Rule for the complainant.

3. By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the applicant Nos.2, 4 and 5 seek anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11206033240697 of 2024 registered with Unjha Police Station, Mehsana, for the offences punishable under Sections 108 and 54 of BNS.

4. It is submitted on behalf of the applicant Nos.2, 4 and 5 that, they are falsely involved in the FIR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top