HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO, J
JAYDEEPBHAI MANILAL CHAVDA – Appellant
Versus
HARIKRUSHNABHAI BHAILALBHAI PATEL – Respondent
ORDER :
(S.V. PINTO, J.)
Heard learned advocate Mr. Johnsey P Mackwan for the applicant and Ms. Dhwani Tripathi learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State.
1. The present application is filed by the applicant – original complainant under Section 419(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “ BNSS ”) seeking leave to file an appeal against the order dated 31.08.2024 passed by the learned 4th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Anand (hereinafter referred to as the “learned Trial Court”) in Criminal Case No. 5624 of 2022 whereby the respondent - original accused came to be acquitted from the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the NI Act”).
2. The applicant submits that the respondent No. 2 had taken an amount of Rs.8,00,000/- from the applicant towards which the respondent No. 2 had issued cheque No. “208059” dated 24-08-2022, from his account with Axis Bank, Vallabh Vidhyanagar Branch. The cheque was deposited by the applicant in his account with Bank of Baroda, Vasad Branch but the cheque returned unpaid with the endorsement “Drawer's Signature Differs”. The applicant gave the demand
The trial court's failure to properly appreciate evidence led to the granting of leave to appeal against the acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
The presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must be drawn in favor of the holder of the cheque, and misinterpretation of evidence by the Trial Court warrants leave to appeal.
The presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act favors the complainant, and the accused must rebut this presumption with credible evidence.
The trial court's failure to properly appreciate evidence warrants reconsideration of the acquittal under Section 138 of the NI Act.
The trial court's acquittal was unjustified due to improper appreciation of evidence and failure to challenge party involvement, warranting leave to appeal.
The court affirmed that the applicant failed to establish a legally enforceable debt under Section 138 of the NI Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for leave.
The court emphasized the necessity for proper appreciation of evidence and documents in cases involving cheque dishonor under Section 138 of the NI Act.
The presumption of a cheque being for discharge of a debt is rebuttable, and the applicant failed to prove the cheque represented a legally enforceable debt.
The court found that the trial Court's failure to properly appreciate evidence justified granting leave to appeal against the acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.
The court emphasized the importance of proper evidence evaluation in criminal cases, allowing the applicant to appeal the acquittal based on perceived misappreciation of evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.