SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(GUJ) 322

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
PATHAN MOHAMADYAKUB @ LAMBU ISMILEKHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:MR PRATIK B BAROT(3711) ,Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

Table of Content
1. application for bail filed (Para 2)
2. arguments for and against bail (Para 3 , 4 , 7)
3. considerations for granting bail (Para 5)
4. court's reasoning for bail (Para 6)
5. bail granted with conditions (Para 8)
6. conditions for bail (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)

ORDER :

2. The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11206020240793 of 2024 registered with Kadi Police Station, District Mahesana for the offences under Sections 8(C), 22(B) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

4. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed the present application and submitted that applicant is caught red handed with conscious possession of contraband and merely charge-sheet is filed is not a ground to grant regular bail to the present applicant. Hence, he has requested to dismiss the present application for regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.

6. I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the investigation papers. In present case, the investigation i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top