Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
JCD
NIRAV GAUTAMBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
(J.C. DOSHI, J.)
1. By this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short “the Code”), the applicants seek quashing of the FIR registered as C.R.No.11207031600055 of 2020 with Kaalol Police Station, Panchmahal for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 427,504 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code read with section 135 of Gujarat Police Act and sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (“the Atrocities Act” for short) and further proceedings arising thereof.
2. The brief facts of the case are as under :
2.1 On 03.02.2020, petitioner no.1 lodged FIR against father, mother, sister and brother of respondent no.2. As a counter blast, respondent no.2 on the same day lodged impugned FIR. In the impugned FIR, it has been alleged by the Respondent No. 2 that when the first informant returned to his home from his job, the petitioners herein were allegedly present near the house of the first informant along with sticks. The petitioners were allegedly hurling abuses in the name of the caste of the first informant and also allegedly threatening to vacate their house and shift to s
The FIR lacked essential elements to support charges under the Atrocities Act, leading to its quashing as an abuse of process.
The FIR lacked essential elements to support charges under the Atrocities Act, leading to its quashing as proceeding would constitute an abuse of process.
To establish an offence under the Atrocities Act, allegations must clearly demonstrate derogatory language used in public view, which was not present in this case.
The FIR under the Atrocities Act was quashed due to lack of essential elements, including public view and caste identification.
The FIR lacked necessary elements to constitute an offence under the Atrocities Act, as no derogatory remarks or public view were established.
The absence of essential elements, such as public view and caste identification, precludes prosecution under the Atrocities Act.
FIR lacks necessary allegations to establish offences under the Atrocities Act, failing to meet legal requirements of public view and specific derogatory remarks.
An FIR under the Atrocities Act is quashed when it lacks essential ingredients necessary to constitute an offence, specifically failing to demonstrate remarks made in public view.
The FIR did not disclose sufficient grounds for offences under the Atrocities Act, lacking essential elements such as derogatory remarks and public view.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
