Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
BHARGAV D. KARIA, D.N. RAY
AMC Corporation through its Partner Pannaben Dilipbhai Modi – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Patan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J.)
1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Mohit R.Balani for the petitioner and learned advocate Ms. Maithili D. Mehta for the respondent.
2. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Ms. Maithili D. Mehta waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent.
3. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 31.03.2022 passed under section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (For short “the Act”) as well as notice under section 148 of the Act for reopening the assessment for Assessment Year 2018-2019 dated 31.03.2022.
4. The petitioner is the erstwhile partner of M/s. AMC Corporation, a partnership firm which is dissolved with effect from 01.04.2017.
5. After 01.04.2017, the petitioner Smt. Pannaben Dilipbhai Modi was proprietor of M/s. AMC Corporation and filed the return of income for Assessment Year 2018-2019 declaring total income of Rs.6,53,620/- on 19.10.2018. Subsequently, the assessment order dated 20.04.2021 was passed by the National e-Assessment Center determining the total income of Rs.28,76,794/-.
6. The petitioner thereafter received a notice dated 13.03.2022 under section 148A(b)
Notices issued in the name of a dissolved partnership firm are invalid, reaffirming the necessity for proper jurisdiction in tax assessments.
A notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act is invalid if issued against a non-existent entity, confirming the need for valid recognition of a company's status post-amalgamation.
Notices issued under the Income Tax Act to a non-existent entity are void ab initio, and proper jurisdiction must be established based on the current legal status of the taxpayer.
The legality of reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act requires scrutiny, yet initial error claims can only be addressed post-assessment.
A notice under section 148 issued to a non-existent entity is invalid, leading to the quashing of both the notice and the subsequent assessment order.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a reassessment notice cannot be issued when the assessment for the relevant year is still pending adjudication before the Dispute Resolution P....
The Assessing Officer must have tangible evidence linking the taxpayer to alleged income escape for valid reassessment under the Income Tax Act; mere suspicion is insufficient.
The provisions of sub-section (1) shall not apply in any case where any such assessment, reassessment or recomputation as is referred to in that sub-section relates to an assessment year in respect o....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
