Back
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
BHARGAV D. KARIA, J,DNR
CHOPRA BULLIONS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
THE NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE – Respondent
ORDER :
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J.)
1. Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr.Tushar Hemani with learned advocate Ms.Vaibhavi K. Parikh for the petitioner and learned Senior Standing Counsel Mr.Varun K. Patel with learned advocate Mr.Dev D. Patel for the respondent.
2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 30th March, 2022 passed by the respondent under Section 147 read with Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) as well as the demand notice issued under Section 156 of the Act of even date for Assessment Year 2014-15 on the ground that the reasons for re-opening were provided on 15th March, 2022 only whereas, the notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued on 29th March, 2021 and the petitioner has filed the return in response to such notice and requested for reasons recorded from time to time.
3. It also appears from the record that though the petitioner has filed the objections on 27th March, 2022 for the reasons for re- opening provided on 15th March, 2022, without disposing of such objections, the impugned Assessment Order is passed by reproducing the reply dated 29th March, 2022 in response to
The failure to address objections before issuing an assessment order violates principles of natural justice, necessitating a fresh assessment.
An assessment order is invalid if objections raised by the taxpayer are not addressed prior to its issuance, ensuring due process in tax assessments.
Objections to re-opening assessments must be addressed before finalizing the assessment order, as established by the Supreme Court.
The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to principles of natural justice, particularly the right to a fair opportunity to respond to show-cause notices in tax assessments.
The court ruled that the failure to provide adequate time for response to a show-cause notice constitutes a breach of natural justice, necessitating the quashing of the Assessment Order.
The court emphasized the necessity of considering a party's response in assessment proceedings, highlighting the violation of natural justice due to insufficient time granted for reply.
The assessment order became void due to the issuance of a new notice under section 148, rendering earlier proceedings infructuous.
Reopening of assessment beyond four years without fresh tangible material or proper disposal of objections is illegal under the Income Tax Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
