SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Guj) 881

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.
Kabir Jitendra Tejwani - Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat - Respondent
Criminal Misc. Application (For Anticipatory Bail) No. 6127 of 2025
Decided On : 26-03-2025

Advocate Appeared:
Petitioner Advocates: MR KISHAN N BRAHMBHATT(11382)
Respondent Advocate: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR(2)

The gravity of allegations involving a minor necessitates custodial interrogation, and consent from a minor is irrelevant in cases of sexual exploitation.

Headnote:

(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 482 - Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 67, 67(a) - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act - Sections 12, 14 - Application for anticipatory bail - Allegations of uploading obscene video of minor - Applicant not named in FIR but involved in the act of sharing and recording obscene material - Court emphasizes the seriousness of the offence against minors and the need for custodial interrogation. (Paras 2.0, 5.0, 9.0)

(B) Anticipatory Bail - Considerations - The court must weigh the nature of the accusation, severity of punishment, and the possibility of tampering with evidence or absconding - The applicant's age and lack of antecedents are insufficient to grant bail in light of the gravity of the offence. (Paras 6.0, 8.0, 10.0)

Facts of the case:
The applicant is accused of uploading an obscene video of a minor victim, allegedly recorded with her consent but later shared without her permission, leading to the filing of an FIR. The applicant has cooperated with the investigation, but the seriousness of the allegations necessitates custodial interrogation. (Paras 3.0, 5.0)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the applicant played an active role in the commission of the offence, implicating him in serious charges under the POCSO Act and IT Act, warranting custodial interrogation. (Paras 8.0, 12.0)

Issues: The court addressed whether the applicant’s conduct warranted anticipatory bail given the serious nature of the allegations involving a minor. (Paras 6.0, 12.0)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the gravity of the offence against a minor necessitates a cautious approach towards granting anticipatory bail, emphasizing that consent from a minor is irrelevant in such cases. (Paras 9.0, 12.0)

Result: Application for anticipatory bail dismissed.

ORDER :

Registry to accept vakalatnama of learned advocate Mr. Salman S. Khan, who has instructions to appear for the original complainant.

1. RULE. Learned APP and learned advocate Mr. Salman S. Khan waive service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 2 respectively.

2. By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the the applicant accused has prayed to release him on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the FIR being CR No.11191067240173 of 2024 registered with Cyber Crime Police Station, Crime Branch, Ahmedabad City for the offences under Sections 67, 67(a) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short “IT Act”) and sections 12 and 14 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (for short “POCSO Act”).

3. The case of the complainant in the FIR is to the effect that the complainant was informed by her niece that someone has uploaded obscene video of the victim i.e. daughter of the complainant who is aged 16 years 9 months and studying in 11th Std. on Telegram App at Crowdy Link channel having user name @crowdylinkk wherein there is a Txt Creator Bot having username @txtcratorbot having link https://t.me/txtcratorbot?start=Z2VOLTEwOTU5NDgyMDAyMTE2MTQ and on opening the said link, the complainant could see obscene video of her daughter and when the complainant asked the victim about the same, she said that she had willingly recorded the said video but did not share the same to anyone. In this regard, the complaint came to be filed.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant is not named in the FIR however, on 18.12.2024, the applicant was taken to police station in police jeep and seized the i-phone 11 of the applicant without any seizure memo. Further, the applicant after being beaten up in the police station to confess, was allowed to go home. Thus, the applicant has cooperated in investigation and even his mobile phone from which alleged obscene material was uploaded or forwarded has already been seized and therefore, now nothing remains to be recovered or discovered from the present applicant and therefore, custodial interrogation of the applicant at this stage is not necessary. Besides, the applicant is available during the course of investigation and will not flee from justice. It is submitted that present applicant is a student pursuing his studies. There is no allegation worth the name against the present applicant and it is alleged that someone has uploaded obscene video of the daughter of the complainant on Telgram App and in this regard complaint is filed. Hence, he has finally requested to consider the case of the applicant as no custodial interrogation is required. Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that she is ready and willing to join the investigation. In view of the above, he has requested to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1 – State and learned advocate Mr. Salman S. Khan appearing for respondent No.2 – original complainant have opposed the present application seeking anticipatory bail on the ground that offence is against a minor girl and considering the severity of the offence and allegations levelled against the applicant as offence is serious in nature, custodial interrogation is required. Further, the applicant lured the victim to create an obscene video of the victim and send it to Instagram account of the applicant having ID: kabir.tejwani and thereafter, the applicant opened the said video on his mobile and through the mobile of co-accused Saumya Rakeshbhai Thakkar recorded the said obscene video and then shared to his mobile through airdrop and then deleted the recording of video from the mobile of co-accused namely Saumya Thakkar. Thereafter, the applicant uploaded the said obscene video on Crowdy Link channel on Telegram App, having username @cro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top