Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
A.S. SUPEHIA, GITA GOPI
Lh of Sarojben Kiritbhai Shah – Appellant
Versus
Amitaben Hemantbhai Jariwala, Chairman of Swami Vivekanand Nagar Cooperative Housing Society – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.S. SUPEHIA, J.
1. The present captioned applications are filed by the applicants praying for initiating the contempt proceedings, both civil as well as criminal under Sections 2(b) and 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, against the respondents.
2. The proceedings emanate from the judgment and order dated 21.06.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application No.8530 of 2019 and the judgment and order dated 23.01.2023 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Letters Patent Appeal No.1075 of 2022, which was filed against the aforesaid judgment and order dated 21.06.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in SCA No.8530 of 2019.
3. It is the case of the applicants, who are the legal heirs of Sarojben Kiritbhai Shah (original respondent No.9.1), that the respondents - Developer and the Society have committed civil contempt by not following their commitment of paying monitory benefits to the applicants arising from the Memorandum of Understanding (in short “the MoU”) dated 02.04.2019, and criminal contempt by obtaining the orders from this court through misleading and false inducement.
4. Learned advocate Ms.Megha Jani, assisted by the learned adv
The court ruled that failure to sign a Memorandum of Understanding precludes claimants from benefits, and contempt proceedings cannot challenge prior judgments.
The court emphasized that contempt proceedings should only be initiated when there is a clear case of wilful disobedience of a court's order and that the respondents followed due process to extend cr....
Willful disobedience of a court order constitutes civil contempt, and late apologies do not absolve responsibility.
Civil contempt is established when a party willfully disobeys a Court order, emphasizing the importance of compliance in maintaining judicial authority.
Willful disobedience of a court order requires knowledge of the order; lack of such knowledge negates contempt.
Civil contempt involves willful disobedience of a court order, requiring intentional actions with knowledge of consequences; negligence is not sufficient for contempt.
Civil contempt proceedings require specific notice of allegations to ensure fair opportunity for defense; penalties must reflect intent and context, particularly when apologies are tendered.
Contempt of court cannot be established without fulfilling necessary legal steps and when external factors such as the Government's vested right are involved.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
