SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Guj) 1087

HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
Vikrambhai Hamirbhai Virda – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR HARESH N JOSHI
For the Respondent: MR HARDIK MEHTA, APP

ORDER :

Though served, respondent No.2 has chosen not to appear before this Court.

[1.0] ADMIT. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat.

[2.0] Present appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as “Atrocity Act”) challenging the order dated 11.10.2024 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, at Keshod in Criminal Misc. Application No.387 of 2024 whereby the learned Judge rejected the application filed by the present appellant under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNSS”) seeking anticipatory bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11203030240683 of 2024 registered with Keshod Police Station, District Junagadh for the offences punishable under Sections 64(2)(m and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (For short “BNS”) and sections 3(1)(w), 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention Atrocities) Act.

[3.0] Learned advocate for the appellant submitted that the appellant has been falsely involved in the offence. The appellant as well as victim both are major. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top