Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BHARGAV D.KARIA, PRANAV TRIVEDI
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1 – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Suresh Chopra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. substantial questions of law raised by revenue (Para 2) |
| 2. assessment details and appeal process (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. acceptable disallowance percentages for bogus purchases (Para 5) |
| 4. tribunal's conclusion based on evidence (Para 6) |
ORDER :
PRANAV TRIVEDI, J.
1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Karan Sanghani for the appellant.
2. The present Tax Appeal is filed under Section 260A of the INCOME TAX ACT , 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) raising following substantial questions of law arising out of the Judgment and Order dated 28.03.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Surat (for short ‘the Tribunal’) in ITA No.373/SRT/2023 in respect of the Assessment Year 2012-2013:-
a) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble ITAT has justified in dismissing the appeal of the Revenue against the decision of the Tribunal in deleting the addition made by the AO at the rate of 100% of bogus purchases amounting to Rs. 116,49,88,059/- ignoring the fact that these purchases are sham transactions fabricated through bogus paper concerns of Bhanwarlal Jain Group companies which were engaged in providing accommodation entries?
b) Whether, on the facts and in the c
Tax authorities must focus on the income component of disputed transactions rather than imposing complete disallowance, ensuring a fair assessment while preventing revenue leakage.
The appellate court affirmed the Tribunal's decision to reduce bogus purchase additions and emphasized adherence to prior judicial rulings as decisive in tax matters.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of a fair and reasonable percentage for the addition in respect of bogus purchases, based on previous judgments and legal provisi....
The court established that in cases of bogus purchases, only a reasonable percentage of the disputed amount should be added to income, reflecting industry practices.
The court ruled that when purchases are deemed bogus, the entire amount should be disallowed, rejecting the Tribunal's speculative estimation of profit margin.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
