IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, D.M.VYAS
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Shaikh Rafik Shaikh Hushain – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J.
1. Assailing the judgment dated 17.08.2013 passed in Sessions Case No. 100 of 2012 on the file of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Surat, whereby, the sole accused was acquitted of the charge for the offence publishable under Section 302 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (herein after referred to as “the IPC”) and was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 304, Part-II of IPC, imposing punishment of only 7 years’ rigorous imprisonment (RI) with fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for 3 months, State has preferred the instant appeal questioning the legality and validity of acquittal of the accused for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC.
2. Fact of the present case lie in a narrow compass and may be stated as follow:
2.1 The deceased is the legally wedded wife of the accused. They were married about 13 years prior to the date of offence. They are blessed with two sons and two daughters during their wedlock.
2.2 On the fateful day of 21.11.2011, at about 8:30 p.m., the accused came to his house and when the deceased, who is his wife, served food to him for his dinner, the accused is not
A sudden quarrel leading to an unintentional act resulting in death qualifies for culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC.
The court confirmed that a dying declaration can be the sole basis for conviction if found credible, and the intentional act of setting a spouse ablaze constitutes murder, not mere culpable homicide.
Unintentional homicide will not come under Section 302 of IPC.
It is open to the High Court on an appeal against an order of acquittal to review the entire evidence and to come to its own conclusion. However the Court has to keep it in mind the well-established ....
The court clarified that actions under intoxication leading to death may constitute culpable homicide not amounting to murder, not murder itself.
Evidence of witnesses who recorded the said dying declarations, Medical Officer and all other evidence in connection with the said dying declarations, it is abundantly clear that the Appellant poured....
Culpable homicide is not murder if committed in a fit of passion during a sudden quarrel, as determined by Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.
The distinction between murder and culpable homicide hinges on the accused's intention, with impulsive actions in a heated moment potentially qualifying for a lesser charge under Section 304-I IPC.
The court established that the distinction between murder and culpable homicide hinges on the intent of the accused, with Section 304 Part-I applicable when the act does not demonstrate a clear inten....
The court ruled that the actions of the accused constituted culpable homicide under Section 304 Part II due to provocation rather than murder under Section 302, emphasizing the necessity of intent in....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.