Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
S.V.PINTO
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Patel Rameshbhai Manilal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case and incident details. (Para 1 , 2) |
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant- State under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgement and order of acquittal passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahesana (hereinafter referred to as "the learned Trial Court") in Sessions Case No. 73 of 2013 on 20.04.2015, whereby, the learned Trial Court has acquitted the respondents for the offence punishable under Sections 323 , 325 and 114 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (IPC) as well as Section 135 of the GUJARAT POLICE ACT (hereinafter referred to as “the G.P.Act”).
1.1] The respondents are hereinafter referred to as “the accused” in the rank and file as they stood in the original case for the sake of convenience, clarity and brevity.
2. The brief facts that emerge from the record of the case are as under:
2.1] On 18-11-2012, at around 16.30 hours, the complainant Vihabhai Ramdas Vandas was in his agricultural land and was putting water in the water line of the machine placed in this agricultural land and at that time, the accused came and told him not to put water in the pipeline and to take his machine fr
In acquittal appeals, the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and minor contradictions do not suffice to overturn a justified acquittal.
An appellate court's power to review acquittal is limited to preserving the presumption of innocence unless there are compelling reasons to deviate from the trial court's findings.
An appellate court must uphold acquittals unless the trial court's findings are perverse or unreasonable, reinforcing the presumption of innocence.
In acquittal appeals, the appellate court respects the presumption of innocence and should not overturn a trial court's judgment unless the view taken is unreasonable or perverse.
An appellate court may review acquittals but must respect the trial court's findings if deemed reasonable and should maintain the presumption of innocence for the accused.
The presumption of innocence reinforces acquittal; appellate courts must respect trial court findings unless evidence is unreasonable.
An appellate court must defer to a trial court's acquittal when the trial's basis is reasonable, emphasizing the principle of presumption of innocence in criminal law.
The appellate court will not overturn an acquittal unless the trial court's decision is unreasonable or perverse, reinforcing the presumption of innocence.
In acquittal appeals, the appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence, not overturning a trial court's reasonable judgment based on lack of evidence and contradictions.
In appeals against acquittal, a court may only interfere if the trial court's conclusions are unreasonable or unsupported by evidence; the presumption of innocence is paramount.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
