Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BHARGAV D. KARIA, PRANAV TRIVEDI
Rajhans Metals Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Central Excise – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
BHARGAV D. KARIA, J.
1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Anand Nainawati for the appellant and learned advocate Mr. Ankit Shah for the respondent.
2. This Tax Appeal is filed under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (For short “the Act”) arising out of the final order dated 07.09.2007 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad (For short “the Tribunal”) in Appeal No.E/696/2007.
3. The appeal is admitted vide order dated 25.06.2009 for consideration of the following substantial questions of law:
“1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the CESTAT is correct in holding that the services received in respect of setting up the captive wind mill plant are not entitled for the Cenvat Credit under rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004?
2. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the CESTAT is correct in rejecting the appeal on the ground that in order to qualify under the definition of input service, the service has to be received in the factory of production?
3. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is correct in rejecting the appeal of the Appellants on the ground that the services
The definition of 'input service' in Cenvat Credit Rules is broad and does not require services to be received at the manufacturing site to qualify for credit.
The definition of input service under the Cenvat Credit Rules is broad, allowing for services related to electricity generation at a distant site to qualify for credit if used in manufacturing activi....
The definition of 'input service' under the Cenvat Credit Rules is broad, allowing for credits on services used indirectly in manufacturing, irrespective of the service location.
The court held that services related to electricity generation for manufacturing qualify as 'input services' for Cenvat Credit, irrespective of physical location, reaffirming broad interpretations of....
Maintenance services for wind turbines qualify as input services under Cenvat Credit Rules; distance from manufacturing does not negate eligibility for credit.
Cenvat credit on services related to electricity generation from windmills is permissible despite location of service, affirming broader interpretation of 'input service' under the rules.
The entitlement to Cenvat credit for service tax on installation and maintenance of windmills is upheld, emphasizing that location does not negate its admissibility as an input service in manufacturi....
The definition of 'input service' under CENVAT Credit Rules includes services used by manufacturers, regardless of location, affirming entitlement to credit for service tax paid on windmill installat....
The court held that input services for setting up and modernizing a factory qualify for Cenvat credit, as they are deemed essential for manufacturing processes under the Cenvat Credit Rules.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
