SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Guj) 1829

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, D.M. VYAS, JJ.
Lakshmanbhai Hirabhai Patadia – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat and Others – Respondents
Special Criminal Application (Habeas Corpus) No. 12017 of 2025
Decided On : 06-10-2025

Advocates Appeared: For the Appellant :Ammar Saiyed For the Respondent: Vrunda Shah

The court ruled that a minor's expressed wishes cannot override parental custody rights, necessitating protective measures until the minor reaches majority.

Headnote:This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for habeas corpus was filed seeking to produce the corpus, a minor, and direct her custody. The Court found that the minor expressed a wish to live with the fourth respondent. The Court deemed it appropriate to keep her in a protective center until she attains the age of majority. It concluded with the directions on the custody of the minor and the ongoing legal proceedings against the fourth respondent.

JUDGMENT :

CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J.

1. This speaking to minutes note is filed by the learned APP Ms.Vrunda Shah seeking permission to keep the corpus, who is a minor in the custody of Nari Sanrakshan Gruh, Paldi, Ahmedabad.

2. Heard learned APP Ms.Vrunda Shah and learned counsel Mr.Saiyed for the writ petitioner.

3. As per the order dated 23.09.2025, while disposing of Special Criminal Application (for Habeas Corpus) No.12017 of 2025, this Court has directed to keep the corpus, who is a minor in the custody of Avaaz Nari Sanrakshan Kendra, Ahmedabad till she attains her age of majority. We have ordered to keep her in the custody of the said Avaaz Nari Sanrakshan Kendra, Ahmedabad at the request of learned APP made on instructions from the concerned police.

4. Now, learned APP Ms.Vrunda Shah submits that the said Avaaz Nari Sanrakshan Kendra, Ahmedabad takes custody of only the major female persons and not the minor female children. Therefore, it is stated that as they refused to take custody of the corpus, who is a minor that they have kept the minor in the custody of Nari Sanrakshan Gruh, Paldi, Ahmedabad. Therefore, she prays to amend the order dated 23.09.2025 directing the corpus to be kept in the custody of Nari Sanrakshan Gruh, Paldi, Ahmedabad and to ratify the action taken by them in keeping the corpus in the custody of Nari Sanrakshan Gruh, Paldi, Ahmedabad in the said inevitable circumstances.

5. Considering the said request made by the learned APP, the order dated 23.09.2025 is accordingly ordered to be amended directing the police to keep the corpus, who is a minor in the custody of Nari Sanrakshan Gruh, Paldi, Ahmedabad. The action taken by the police in keeping the corpus in the custody of Nari Sanrakshan Gruh, Paldi, Ahmedabad is hereby approved and ratified with retrospective effect from the date of the order.

6. Learned APP Ms.Vrunda Shah also submits that she received instructions from the concerned officer of Nari Sanrakshan Gruh, Paldi, Ahmedabad that the corpus is now willing to accompany her parents. Therefore, she requests permission to move an application to permit her to accompany her parents. The said liberty was already granted in our order dated 23.09.2025. Therefore, if the corpus, according to her free will and volition is willing to accompany her parents, concerned officer of Nari Sanrakshan Gruh, Paldi, Ahmedabad is at liberty to move the Court for passing an appropriate order.

7. The note for speaking to minutes stands allowed. Rest of the order remains intact. Registry is directed to issue fresh writ/order accordingly.

Order in Note filed by learned advocate for the writ petitioner:-

8. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner has filed a note in the Registry with a request to release the corpus from shelter home and give her custody to her parents on the ground that the corpus is now willing to accompany her parents.

9. When the Court has raised objection as to how the petitioner could file such a note when no such liberty is granted to him in the order dated 23.09.2025 and as liberty was given only to the concerned officer of Avaaz Nari Sanrakshan Kendra, Ahmedabad, learned counsel for the writ petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the note.

10. Permission is granted. Therefore, the note is dismissed as withdrawn.

ORDER :

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for habeas corpus is filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondents-police officials to produce the corpus who is his minor daughter aged about 15 years 3 months and 20 days before the Court and then to pass appropriate order according to law.

2. The petitioner is the father of the corpus by name Komal Lakshmanbhai Patadia who is a minor aged about 15 years 3 months and 20 days. Is is stated that 4th respondent has kidnapped her on 03/08/2025 on the pretext of marrying her. As she was not found even after thorough search by the petitioner, he has lodged a report with Dasada Police Station and the police

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top