Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J
Dilip Natu Bhai Rajput – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of conspiracy and financial fraud. (Para 3) |
| 2. petitioner claims innocence; challenges evidence presented. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court finds prima facie involvement and evidence suggesting fraud. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. legal standards for quashing reflect narrow review scope. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 5. final dismissal of the quashing application based on evidence. (Para 11) |
ORDER :
Hasmukh D. Suthar, J.
1) RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of respondent No.1 – State of Gujarat.
2) By way of present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 the petitioner has sought following relief(s):-
“(B) The Hon’ble Court may please to allow this Special Criminal Application by issuing appropriate writ, order of direction quashing and setting aside the F.I.R. No.11200019251315 under Section 465/467/468/471/406/420/120B IPC Police Station Dongri Dist. Valsaad which is placed at Annexure-D, and also please to quash the further proceeding arising thereof qua the petitioner in the interest of justice;
(C) Pending admission and till final disposal of the present application, the Hon’
The court affirmed that prima facie evidence of a conspiracy and forgery necessitates proceeding with trial, emphasizing the narrow scope of quashing FIRs under Section 482.
Bona fide purchasers cannot be implicated in forgery or fraud where they have no part in wrongdoing, and prior allegations point to their victimization.
Point of law: Criminal cases involving offences which arise from commercial, financial, mercantile, partnership or similar transactions with an essentially civil flavour may in appropriate situations....
Fraudulent intent must be established for criminal liability in financial transactions, distinguishing between civil breaches of contract and criminal offenses like cheating.
Criminal proceedings ought not to be scuttled at the initial stage. Quashing of a complaint should rather be an exception and a rarity than an ordinary rule. Considering the allegations made in the c....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
