Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
S.V. PINTO
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Bharatbhai Hemabhai Patel – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.V. PINTO, J.
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant State under Section 3 78(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal passed by learned Special Judge, Patan (hereinafter referred to as "the learned Trial Court") in Special (Atrocity) Case No. 19 of 2012 on 25-09-2012, whereby, the learned Trial Court has acquitted the respondents for the offence punishable under Sections 143 , 447, 146, 506(2) and 114 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (hereafter referred to as "IPC" for short) and Section 3 (1)(4) (5)(10) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as "Atrocities Act") .
1.1 The respondents are hereinafter referred to as the accused in the rank and file as they stood in the original case for the sake of convenience, clarity and brevity.
1.2 By an order of this Court dated 13-04-2023, the original complainant was joined as a party to the proceeding and a notice was issued through the concerned police station. As per the report of the learned Additional Session Judge, Patan, while serving the notice to the complainant by the Patan City "A" Division Police Sta
An appeal against acquittal should respect the presumption of innocence and not interfere if the acquittal is based on reasonable conclusions drawn from evidence.
An appellate court has broad powers to review evidence in acquittal appeals but should exercise caution, respecting the presumption of innocence unless the trial court's conclusions are unreasonable.
An appellate court may review evidence in acquittal cases but should not interfere unless the trial court's decision is unreasonable or perverse, maintaining the presumption of innocence.
The appellate court may review evidence in acquittal appeals but should not reverse a trial court's acquittal unless the trial court's decision is unreasonable or perverse.
The appellate court cannot overturn an acquittal unless the trial court's decision is found to be unreasonable or lacks a proper evidentiary basis.
In acquittal appeals, presumption of innocence is reinforced, and the appellate court should only interfere with the acquittal if the trial court's ruling is perverse or unreasonable based on the pre....
The appellate court should respect the presumption of innocence in acquittals and only interfere if the trial court's verdict lacks reasonable foundation.
The appellate court observed that a trial acquittal must not be overturned without compelling evidence, maintaining a strong presumption of innocence for the accused.
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing the necessity of substantial evidence for conviction and the presumption of innocence for the accused.
In appeals against acquittal, the appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and only intervene if the trial court's decision is perverse or unsupported by evidence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
