SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Guj) 2064

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BHARGAV D. KARIA, PRANAV TRIVEDI, JJ.
Sintex - BAPL Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat and Others – Respondents
Special Civil Application Nos. 9855, 9864, 10988 of 2025
Decided On : 28-08-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Saurabh Soparkar, Jay Kansara, Wadiaghandy
For the Respondents: Shrunjal Shah, Hetvi Sancheti

The approval of a resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code extinguishes all prior tax liabilities of a corporate debtor, affirming the legal cleansing effect of the IBC.

Headnote:(A) Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - Sections 61, 73, and 74 - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) initiated against corporate debtor - Tax liabilities extinguished upon approval of Resolution Plan - Impugned orders against corporate debtor were quashed as they related to periods prior to the effective date of the Resolution Plan (Paras 6, 8.1, 12, and 13).

(B) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 31 - The provisions mandate that upon approval of a resolution plan, all claims not included in the plan stand extinguished - The court reaffirmed that statutory claims owed to the Government are also covered under this mandate (Paras 20 and 12).

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a corporate debtor, involved in manufacturing plastic products, filed for CIRP. Following approval of a resolution plan, the petitioner contested tax demands issued based on pre-resolution periods, claiming they were extinguished (Paras 5.1 to 5.5, 8.1).

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the extinguishment of all tax liabilities upon approval of the resolution plan, citing the IBC principles and Supreme Court precedents (Paras 12 and 13).

Issues: The primary issues included whether tax demands raised against the petitioner post-Resolution Plan approval were valid and enforceable (Paras 12).

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that claims against the corporate debtor not part of the approved resolution plan are extinguished, affirming the legal interpretation of the IBC and its intent to provide a clean slate post-resolution (Paras 10, 20).

Result: Petition succeeds, and all impugned orders and notices are quashed and set aside.

Table of Content
1. consolidation of petition facts under article 226. (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. petitioner status as a corporate debtor and relevant implications. (Para 5)
3. arguments presented by both parties regarding the extinguishment. (Para 6 , 7)
4. supreme court clarifications on extinguishment of tax liabilities. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. court decision to quash previous orders and notices. (Para 13)

JUDGMENT :

PRANAV TRIVEDI, J.

1. Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr.Saurabh Soparkar with learned advocate Mr.Jay Kansara, for M/s. Wadiaghandy & Co.,for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms.Shrunjal Shah for the respondent in Special Civil Application Nos.9855 of 2025 and 10988 of 2025 and Ms.Hetvi Sancheti, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent in Special Civil Application No.9864 of 2025.

2. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned Assistant Government Pleader Ms.Shrunjal Shah, waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent.

3. With consent of learned advocates for the respective parties, the matters are taken up for hearing as the issue involved is very short. All the three petitions have common issue, therefore, are being disposed of by this common order and judgement. For the sake of convenience, the facts of Special Civil Application No.9855 of 2025 are taken as lead matter.

4. The petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with the following prayers:

“(a) Issue a writ of certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside (i) order dated 8th April 2022 for FY 2019-20 at Annexure A passed by Respondent No.2, (ii) order dated 9th December 2024 at Annexure B for FY 2017-18 passed by Respondent No.2; (iii) order dated 15th February 2025 at Annexure C, for FY 2020-21 passed by Respondent No.3 against the petitioner; and (iv) Notice dated 5th June 2025 at Annexure D, for FY 2021-22 issued by Respondent No.2; (iv) Show Cause Notice dated 12th June 2025, at Annexure E for FY 2018-19 issued by Respondent No.4; (vi) Show Cause Notice dated 27th June 2025 at Annexure F, for FY 2018-19 issued by Respondent No.4; and (vii) Show Cause Notice dated 30th June 2025 at Annexure-G for FY 2018- 19 issued by Respondent No.3 along with all other proceedings or coercive action relating thereto;

(b) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction restraining the Respondents from taking any action for recovery of GST, penalty, interest charges or other claims of any kind relating to a period prior to the Effective Date i.e. 29th March 2023 under the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax, 2017 read with Central Goods and Services Tax, 2017 read with Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017;

(c) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondents for withdrawing / removing the outstanding demand / liability reflecting against the Petitioner’s GST NO. 24AADCB1921F2Z9 on the GST portal in respect of (I) order dated 8th April 2022 for FY 2019-20 at Annexure A passed by Respondent No.2; (ii) order dated 9th December 2024 at Annexure B for FY 2017-18 passed by Respondent No.2; and (iii) order dated 15th February 2025 at Annexure C for FY 2020-21 passed by Respondent No.3 against the petitioner;

(d) Issue a Writ of Mandamus and / or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondents to issue intimation in Form DRC GST-25 to the Petitioner in accordance with Section 84 of the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with Rule 161 of the Gujarat Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 and Circular No.187/19/2022-GST dated 27th December 2022;

(e) Pending admission, hearing and final disposal of the present Petition, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to stay the effect, operation and implementation of the (i) order dated 8th April 2022 for FY 2019-20 at Annexure A passed by Respondent No.2, (ii) order dated 9th December 2024 at Annexure B for FY 2017-18 passed by Respondent No.2; (iii) order dated 15th 15th February 2025 at Annexure C for FY

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top