Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
GITA GOPI, UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Jerambhai Dhudabhai Prajapati – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by the appellant. (Para 3) |
| 3. details of the incidents and witness testimonies. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. issues surrounding the credibility of evidence. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. evaluation of dying declaration and its impact. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. conclusion on appellate review principles. (Para 15) |
| 7. final verdict and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 16) |
JUDGMENT :
GITA GOPI, J.
1. The State has filed the present appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Cr.P.C.’ for short) challenging the judgment and order of acquittal dated 09.11.2004 passed by the Fast Track Court, Dhrangadhra in Sessions Case No.41 of 1999, wherein three accused were put to trial under Section 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’).
2. The FIR as C.R. No.1 of 1997 was registered with Dasada Police Station under Sections 302 and 452 of IPC by Dhudiben Nanjibhai Prajapati in Civil Hospital on 05.01.1997. It had been alleged by her that at 10:00 p.m. in the night hours, the complainant and her son Mahendra were sleeping in the house, the complainant – husband
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal of the accused due to the lack of reliable evidence and doubts regarding the credibility of witness testimonies, emphasizing that reasonable dou....
The reliability of dying declarations, the importance of consistency in witness statements, and the principle that if two reasonable conclusions are possible based on the evidence, the appellate cour....
An appellate court can only overturn an acquittal if it finds a clear error or illegality in the trial court's judgment, maintaining the presumption of innocence.
The court upheld the principle that an accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty, emphasizing the need for compelling reasons to overturn an acquittal based on insufficient evidence.
The burden of proof lies with the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and a dying declaration requires corroborative evidence to be deemed reliable.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the prosecution to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt, the presumption of innocence in favor of the accused, and the s....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
