SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Guj) 125

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
J.C.DOSHI
Kodarbhai Kevdabhai Hadat – Appellant
Versus
Collector – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Hiren M Modi

Table of Content
1. questions of law in second appeal (Para 1 , 3)
2. plaintiff's claim of land allotment (Para 4)
3. arguments presented by the appellant (Para 5)
4. scope of jurisdiction in second appeal (Para 7 , 8 , 10)
5. court's analysis of evidence (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
6. conclusion of the court's decision (Para 19 , 20)

ORDER :

J. C. DOSHI, J.

1. This second appeal u/s 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short “the Code”) questions the legality and propriety of the judgment and decree dated 15.11.2025 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Arvalli @ Modasa in Regular Civil Appeal No.37 of 2022, by which the learned appellate Court dismissed the appeal and confirmed the judgment and decree dated 28.4.2018 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Jujdge, Modasa in Regular Civil Suit No.75 of 2010, whereby the plaintiff’s suit was dismissed.

2. For the sake of convenience and brevity, parties are referred to as per their original status before the learned trial Court.

3. Following questions of law have been posed as substantial questions of law:-

“(a) Whether the Courts below have committed a substantial error of law in holding that no enforceable right can arise und

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top