Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SUNITA AGARWAL, D.N.RAY
Shrey Education Trust Through Its Managing Trustee Shrikant Vasudevbhai Patel – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. affiliation approval for educational institution. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arbitrary denial of admission to recognized institutions. (Para 4 , 5 , 11 , 15) |
| 3. importance of timelines in admission processes. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. clarification on extension applicability for admissions. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. dismissal of appeal for lack of merit. (Para 16) |
ORDER :
SUNITA AGARWAL, C.J.
Heard the learned advocates for the respective parties and perused the record.
1.1 An affidavit is sought to be filed in the Court bringing on record certain facts and events pertaining to the decision of the Apex Court, wherein extensions have been granted for completion of the admission process for the Academic Session 2025-2026, which is unsupported by an application seeking leave of the Court to file such an affidavit bringing on record the additional facts, which were placed before the learned single Judge. The said affidavit filed today in the Court, is taken on record.
2. The relevant facts are that the petitioner institution is an educational institution, which has been granted affiliation by the Gujarat Technological University for starting a new college for imparting D.Pharm course. F
The court underscored the importance of adhering to established admission timelines for professional courses, rejecting claims of arbitrary actions by regulatory authorities in the absence of timely ....
Adherence to the time schedule for approval and lack of exceptional circumstances to grant approval for the academic session 2016-2017.
The rejection of an academic approval proposal without consideration of compliance and opportunity for hearing violates natural justice principles; adherence to regulatory timelines is mandatory.
The right to establish an educational institution does not guarantee inclusion in student allotment if statutory approvals were received post counselling conclusion, highlighting the necessity of adh....
The right to establish a nursing institution does not guarantee student allotment after the statutory admissions process has concluded, emphasizing strict adherence to timelines for counseling.
The right to establish a nursing institution does not equate to entitlement for student allotment once admissions under the regulatory framework have concluded.
The court held that there is no vested right to an extension of admission cut-off dates and emphasized the importance of maintaining set deadlines to avoid disruption in academic schedules.
Timelines for application submissions in educational affiliation processes must be strictly adhered to, ensuring fairness and clarity.
Point of Law : Conditions imposed in the impugned order rejecting the application on the ground of deficiencies became redundant.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
