SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Gau) 57

T.N.SINGH
ANUPAM CHAKRABORTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

This case is concerned with a small incident of burglary but, it carries a big burden of a fundamental question. What is the ambit of powers and jurisdiction of a criminal Court to add as an accused any person to stand trial for an offence for which he is not charge-sheeted by the police ? The question is indeed fundamental in the sense that criminal Courts exist to try offenders for the protection of society. While powers and jurisdiction of the courts are circumscribed by the provisions of the Code the question is how those provisions which have a bearing on this fundamental duty of the Courts are to be interpreted.

2. On 6-2-79 an information was lodged by the Proprietor of Hind Pharmacy, Jorhat, with the officer-in-charge of Jorhat P. S. in which it was stated that there was a burglary in his shop during the preceding night. On the basis of this FIR the police made investigation and submitted charge-sheet dt. 10-4-79 under Ss. 457/380/411 IPC in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jorhat, whereupon cognizance was taken on 2-5-79 by the Court. In the charge-sheet one Swapan Dutta and another Radheshyam Paul were shown as accused in custody and the petitioner's name a























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top