SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Gau) 101

PRASANTA KUMAR SAIKIA
Sudhir Ranjan Chanda – Appellant
Versus
Uma Dutta – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Mr. K. Paul
For Respondents/Defendant: Mr. S. Jindal

JUDGMENT

Prasanta Kumar Saikia, J.

1. This proceeding under Article 227 or the Constitution of India has been initiated for staying the Title Execution case No. 1(H) of 2012, now, pending in the Court of Munsiff, Shillong all the disposal of the Title Suit No. 26 (H) of 2002 in the Court of Assistant District Judge, Shillong which was preferred by the judgment debtor in the Title Execution case No. 1 (H) of 2012. It may be mentioned that the Title Suit No. 26(H) 2002 was dismissed for default and a proceeding under Rule 4 of Order 9 of the CPC has already been initiated for restoration of the dismissed suit which is waiting disposal. It may also be noted that the decree holder in the Title Execution case No. 1(H) of 2012 was the plaintiff in Title Suit No. 25 (H) of 1997 and the judgment debtor therein, viz., the Title Execution case No. 1(H) of 2012, was the defendant in Title Suit No. 25 (H) of 1997 who, as plaintiff, instituted the Title Suit No. 26 (H) of 2002 in the Court of Assistant District Judge seeking various relief against the defendant therein who, as stated above, was none other than the decree holder in Title Execution case No. 1(H) of 2012.

2. The facts, as it appears


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top